SynthesisMedicine2021
Safety and efficacy of Prunella vulgaris preparation in adjuvant treatment of thyroid nodules: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Comprehensive Exploration of Thyroid Nodules Diagnosis, Epidemiology and Pathophysiology with Emphasis on the Role of Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Bioactive components inHeliyon · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrunella vulgaris (PV), a traditional Chinese medical herb, is considered beneficial for some thyroid diseases. However, the effectiveness is not consistent in different studies. This review compiles the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quantifies the effects of PV preparation on thyroid nodules.
methodsEight databases were searched up to April 2021 to identify eligible studies. Only RCTs were included. Meta-analysis of homogeneous studies was performed by RevMan5.3 software. Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool version 2.0 was used to assess the risk of bias of each trial. The research screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were employed by 2 reviewers independently, and disagreement will be decided by a third senior reviewer. The risk ratio (RR), mean difference (MD) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) of each study are summarized.
resultsThirteen RCTs with 1468 patients were included in this study. A meta-analysis showed that the RR of the clinical efficacy of PV combined with levothyroxine sodium tablets was 1.22 (95% CI [1.11, 1.33]). The MD of thyroid nodule diameter was -0.43 (95% CI [-0.63, -0.22]). The MD of free triiodothyronine and free tetraiodothyronine levels was -1.99 (95% CI [-3.14, -0.86]) and -3.20 (95% CI [-5.50, -0.89]), respectively. The RR of the adverse reaction rate was 0.67 (95% CI [0.36, 1.22]), and the RR of the clinical efficacy of PV preparation combined with thyroxin tablets was 1.29 (95% CI [1.03, 1.62]).
conclusionsPV combined with levothyroxine sodium tablets or thyroxin tablets has more benefits for thyroid nodules, further improving the clinical efficiency, reducing the diameter of nodules and reducing the occurrence of adverse reactions. However, the quality of these studies is uncertain, and higher quality and more RCTs are needed to provide comprehensive evidence-based medical evidence in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.