Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34731107›Full record

ArticleMedicine2021

Efficacy of therapies in the treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome: A network meta-analysis.

Jingfeng Lin, Qiang Gao, Kang Xiao, Danfeng Tian, Wenyue Hu, Zhenyun Han

Open access · goldAbstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Reply toEuropean journal of translational myology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Guillain-Barré syndrome.BJA education · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Principles of Therapeutic Apheresis in Neurological Disease.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jingfeng LinHangzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6307-1864
Qiang GaoBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Kang XiaoBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Danfeng TianBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Wenyue HuBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Zhenyun HanShenzhen Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (Longgang), Shenzhen, China.
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNHangzhou Seventh Peoples Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No.81673910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) is a disease with the features of acuteness, paralysis, inflammation, and in peripheral nerves. There are many current treatment options with varying efficacy, and to assess their effectiveness, we performed a network meta-analysis (NMA). The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD: 42019119178). Posted history: this manuscript was previously posted to medRxiv: doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.03.20121780.

methodsThe literature search database includes Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library that meets the requirements. We performed the NMA using controlled trials with 2 kinds of outcomes. We used the gemtc R package to perform the NMA to evaluate different GBS treatments' relative results. The consistency of direct and indirect evidence was also assessed by R software with gemtc package.

resultsThis NMA study included a total of 2474 subjects from 28 trials with 15 kinds of therapies. No improvement was observed in methylprednisolone and prednisolone compared with placebo. Conversely, plasma exchange (PE) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) were more effective than placebo. There was no significant difference between different doses and courses of PE and IVIg. For combination treatment, such as IVIg+eculizumab, immunoadsorption followed by IVIg and PE followed by IVIg, they didn't show significant advantages than IVIg and PE in NMA. On the consistency examination between direct and indirect evidence, there was no apparent heterogeneity between them. Funnel plots indicated there was little possibility of publication bias in this study.

conclusionPE or IVIg has significant efficacy for GBS patients. The effects of several kinds of therapies should be further explored. Corticosteroids have no considerable impact on GBS.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareCombined Modality TherapyGuillain-Barre SyndromeHumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousMethylprednisolonePlasma ExchangeImmunoglobulins, IntravenousMethylprednisolone

Identifiers

PMID34731107
PMCPMC8519256
OpenAlexW3210645809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.