Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34731079›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Extreme suction attachment performance from specialised insects living in mountain streams (Diptera: Blephariceridae).

Victor Kang, Robin T White, Simon Chen, Walter Federle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hydrofoil-like legs help stream mayfly larvae to stay on the ground.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Victor KangDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0959-1364
Robin T WhiteCarl Zeiss Research Microscopy Solutions, Pleasanton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0030-2872
Simon ChenDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6316-7567
Walter FederleDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6375-3005

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suction is widely used by animals for strong controllable underwater adhesion but is less well understood than adhesion of terrestrial climbing animals. Here we investigate the attachment of aquatic insect larvae (Blephariceridae), which cling to rocks in torrential streams using the only known muscle-actuated suction organs in insects. We measured their attachment forces on well-defined rough substrates and found that their adhesion was less reduced by micro-roughness than that of terrestrial climbing insects. In vivo visualisation of the suction organs in contact with microstructured substrates revealed that they can mould around large asperities to form a seal. We have shown that the ventral surface of the suction disc is covered by dense arrays of microtrichia, which are stiff spine-like cuticular structures that only make tip contact. Our results demonstrate the impressive performance and versatility of blepharicerid suction organs and highlight their potential as a study system to explore biological suction mechanisms.

Indexed as

Aquatic OrganismsAdhesivenessAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaLarvaNematoceraRiversadhesionaquatic invertebratebiomechanicsecologyphysics of living systemssurface roughnessunderwater adhesion

Identifiers

PMID34731079
PMCPMC8565926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.