ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2022
Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in predicting early lymph-node metastasis in oral cancer.
Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) in Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis of Oral Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Pooled it
- The Use of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for Therapy Monitoring of Metastatic Lymph Nodes: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Pooled it
- Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes Using a Multi-Modal Ultrasound-Based Machine Learning Model With SHAP Interpretability.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Multimodal imaging of cervical lymphadenopathy: diagnostic value and clinical applications.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2025Review
- Comparing the Efficacy of CT, MRI, PET-CT, and US in the Detection of Cervical Lymph Node Metastases in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Clinically Negative Neck Lymph Node: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in predicting early lymph node metastasis in clinically node-negative oral cancer patients.
methodsWe recruited 42 patients (a total of 70 lymph nodes) with clinically node-negative oral cancer in the study. All of them received both conventional ultrasound (B-mode and power Doppler) and CEUS before operation and then they were taken for pathological examination to analyze the diagnostic accuracy. And their CEUS data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively.
resultsThe sensitivity and specificity of CEUS in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis of oral cancer were 82.7 and 82.9%, respectively. The accuracy of conventional ultrasound was only 67.1% while that of CEUS was up to 82.9%. The area under the cure (AUC) of CEUS in detecting lymph node metastasis was 0.828, which was higher than the 0.614 by conventional ultrasound, with statistically significant differences observed (
conclusionsCompared with conventional ultrasound, CEUS may have higher clinical value for predicting early lymph node metastasis in clinically node-negative oral cancer patients. And quantitative parameters obtained from CEUS may provide valuable information in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.