ArticleCroatian medical journal2021
The SPARE score reliably predicts the conversion from open partial to radical nephrectomy.
Article in Croatian medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis and systematic review of factors predicting conversion to radical nephrectomy following robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy in renal cancer patients.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Interobserver reproducibility of RENAL nephrometry score in comparison to simplified PADUA Renal nephrometry score.Urology annalsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess the power of nephrometry scores to predict the intraoperative conversion from partial nephrectomy (PN) to radical nephrectomy (RN).
methodsWe identified all the patients at our institution who were scheduled for PN between April 2012 and December 2017. Patients who underwent robotic or laparoscopic surgery were excluded. A total of 149 patients (94 men) who underwent open surgery and had complete data were included. The power of the R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, SPARE, and DAP scores to predict the conversion to RN, and the threshold values were assessed. In the multivariate analysis, the predictive power of the nephrometry scores was tested by separately including them in different models.
resultsThe median age was 57 (48-67) years, while the median follow-up was 15 (7-29.5) months. The overall conversion rate was 10.7%. The optimal cut-off values for the R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, SPARE, and DAP scores were 7.5, 9.5, 5.5 and 7.5, respectively. The SPARE score had the highest area under the curve (AUC=0.807, P<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the SPARE score had the highest odds ratio (OR 12.561; confidence interval 3.456-45.534, P<0.001].
conclusionA high SPARE score was significantly associated with the conversion to RN in patients who underwent open PN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34730886PMC8596471W3210249552What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.