Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34730819›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Attitudes and Intentions of US Veterans Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination.

Guneet K Jasuja, Mark Meterko, Ledjona D Bradshaw, Richard Carbonaro, Marla L Clayman, Lara LoBrutto, Danielle Miano, Elizabeth M Maguire, Amanda M Midboe, Steven M Asch and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Insights Into Veterans' Motivations and Hesitancies for COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Early Mortality After the First Dose of COVID-19 Vaccination: A Target Trial Emulation.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among U.S. Veterans Experiencing Homelessness in Transitional Housing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The role of social media in monitoring COVID-19 vaccine uptake.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Guneet K JasujaBridge Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Program, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts.
Mark MeterkoOffice of Analytics and Performance Integration, Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, District of Columbia.
Ledjona D BradshawOffice of Analytics and Performance Integration, Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, District of Columbia.
Richard CarbonaroBridge Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Program, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts.
Marla L ClaymanBridge Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Program, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts.
Lara LoBruttoBridge Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Program, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts.
Danielle MianoBridge Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Program, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts.
Elizabeth M MaguireBridge Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Program, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts.
Amanda M MidboeBridge Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Program, Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, California.
Steven M AschBridge Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Program, Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, California.
Allen L GiffordSection of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
D Keith McInnesBridge Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Program, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts.
A Rani ElwyBridge Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Program, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts.
Quality Enhancement Research Initiative · USBoston University · USStanford University · USVA Boston Healthcare System · USOffice of Patient Care Services · USVeterans Health Administration · US

Funding

HSRD VA I50 HX003292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Compared with the general population, veterans are at high risk for COVID-19 and have a complex relationship with the government. This potentially affects their attitudes toward receiving COVID-19 vaccines. Objective: To assess veterans' attitudes toward and intentions to receive COVID-19 vaccines. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional web-based survey study used data from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients' Veterans Insight Panel, fielded between March 12 and 28, 2021. Of 3420 veterans who were sent a link to complete a 58-item web-based survey, 1178 veterans (34%) completed the survey. Data were analyzed from April 1 to August 25, 2021. Exposures: Veterans eligible for COVID-19 vaccines. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcomes of interest were veterans' experiences with COVID-19, vaccination status and intention groups, reasons for receiving or not receiving a vaccine, self-reported health status, and trusted and preferred sources of information about COVID-19 vaccines. Reasons for not getting vaccinated were classified into categories of vaccine deliberation, dissent, distrust, indifference, skepticism, and policy and processes. Results: Among 1178 respondents, 974 (83%) were men, 130 (11%) were women, and 141 (12%) were transgender or nonbinary; 58 respondents (5%) were Black, 54 veterans (5%) were Hispanic or Latino, and 987 veterans (84%) were non-Hispanic White. The mean (SD) age of respondents was 66.7 (10.1) years. A total of 817 respondents (71%) self-reported being vaccinated against COVID-19. Of 339 respondents (29%) who were not vaccinated, those unsure of getting vaccinated were more likely to report fair or poor overall health (32 respondents [43%]) and mental health (33 respondents [44%]) than other nonvaccinated groups (overall health: range, 20%-32%; mental health: range, 18%-40%). Top reasons for not being vaccinated were skepticism (120 respondents [36%] were concerned about side effects; 65 respondents [20%] preferred using few medications; 63 respondents [19%] preferred gaining natural immunity), deliberation (74 respondents [22%] preferred to wait because vaccine is new), and distrust (61 respondents [18%] did not trust the health care system). Among respondents who were vaccinated, preventing oneself from getting sick (462 respondents [57%]) and contributing to the end of the COVID-19 pandemic (453 respondents [56%]) were top reasons for getting vaccinated. All veterans reported the VA as 1 of their top trusted sources of information. The proportion of respondents trusting their VA health care practitioner as a source of vaccine information was higher among those unsure about vaccination compared with those who indicated they would definitely not or probably not get vaccinated (18 respondents [26%] vs 15 respondents [15%]). There were no significant associations between vaccine intention groups and age (χ24 = 5.90; P = .21) or gender (χ22 = 3.99; P = .14). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings provide information needed to develop trusted messages used in conversations between VA health care practitioners and veterans addressing specific vaccine hesitancy reasons, as well as those in worse health. Conversations need to emphasize societal reasons for getting vaccinated and benefits to one's own health.

Indexed as

AttitudeIntentionAdultAgedCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34730819
PMCPMC8567110
OpenAlexW3210670298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.