Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34730530›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2021

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score in patients with musculoskeletal tumors.

Bahadır Ocaktan, Mehmet Ali Deveci, Aliekber Yapar, Mehmet Ali Tokgöz, Aykın Şimşek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Editorial.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bahadır OcaktanDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hitit University, Erol Olçok Training and Research Hospital, Çorum, Turkey.
Mehmet Ali DeveciDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Koç University, School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Aliekber YaparDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Dr.Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Mehmet Ali TokgözDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara Keçiören Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Aykın ŞimşekDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Koç University, School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Koç University · TRAnkara Onkoloji Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRHitit Üniversitesi · TRS.B. Keçiören Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the study was to translate theToronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) into Turkish and perform acrosscultural adaptation for patients with musculoskeletal tumors.

methodsThirty-six patients (20 male, 16 female; mean age = 36.6 ± 15.4 years) who were diagnosed with malignant bone and soft tissue sarcoma or benign aggressive bone tumors between the years 2007 and 2012 were included in the study. TESS was translated into Turkish and back translated to determine language validity. To test convergent validity, the Turkish versions of the Short Form-36 (SF-36), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) were used. SF-36 was used on all patients while WOMAC and DASH were used onpatients with lower extremity tumors and upper extremity tumors respectively. The tests were repeated 15 days later and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine test-retest reliability.

resultsThe Turkish version of TESS was found to have a strong negative correlation with WOMAC (r = -0.702; P < 0.001) and DASH (r = -0.774; P < 0.001) as well as a strong negative correlation with ROMS (r = 0.601; P < 0.001). Turkish TESS also had a statistically significant correlation with SF-36-Physical functioning, SF-36-Role Physical, SF-36-Bodily Pain, and SF36-General Health at levels ranging from 0.326 to 0.669 (r values ranging from 0.326 to 0.669, P < 0.001). The internal consistency (Cronbach's α:0.96 for lower extremity and Cronbach's α:0.94 for upper extremity) and test-retest reliability of Turkish TESS were found to be excellent (ICC lower extremity: 0.96 [0.935-0.983]; P < 0.001 and ICC upper extremity: 0.99 [0.967-0.997]; P < 001). ICC values varied between 0.674 and 0.987 for each item of the scale for both extremities. Conlusion: The Turkish version of TESS seems to be a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate physical function after musculoskeletal tumor surgery in Turkish patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Diagnostic Study.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonLanguageAdultDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34730530
PMCPMC12462875
OpenAlexW3198434072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.