ArticleJournal of hospital medicine2021
Deficits in Identification of Goals and Goal-Concordant Care After Sepsis Hospitalization.
Article in Journal of hospital medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Prognostic Notifications on Inpatient Advance Care Planning: A Cluster Randomized Trial.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2025Trial
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign beyond survival: aligning sepsis care with patient goals.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Assessment of a Zero-Shot Large Language Model in Measuring Documented Goals-of-Care Discussions.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2026Article
- Goals of Care Assessment during Hospitalization for Sepsis.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Article
- Measuring Goal-Concordant Care Using Electronic Clinical Notes.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Leveraging the electronic health record to identify delivery of goal-concordant care.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Classification of Documented Goals of Care Among Hospitalized Patients with High Mortality Risk: a Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Hospital-Onset Sepsis Warrants Expanded Investigation and Consideration as a Unique Clinical Entity.Chest · 2024Review
- Determining Goal Concordant Care in the Intensive Care Unit Using Electronic Health Records.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2023Article
- Receipt of Recovery-Oriented Care Practices During Hospitalization for Sepsis.Critical care explorations · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In a recent study, identifying and supporting patients' care goals was named the highest priority in hospital medicine. Although sepsis is one of the leading causes of death and postdischarge morbidity among hospitalized patients, little is known about how frequently care goals are assessed prior to discharge and adhered to in the 90 days after sepsis hospitalization. Evaluating a cohort of 679 high-risk sepsis survivors enrolled in a clinical trial, we found that care goals were documented explicitly in a standardized tool in 130 patients; an additional 139 patients were identified using all available clinical documentation, resulting in only 269 (40%) patients with goals that could be ascertained from the electronic health record (EHR). Among those categorized, goals were classified as prioritizing longevity (35%), function (52%), and comfort (12%). Based on expert review of the care provided during the 90 days subsequent to discharge, goal-concordant care was identified in 184 (68%) cases for which goals were specified. Documentation of goals in a standardized EHR tool was associated with increased likelihood of receiving goal-concordant care (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.4-5.5). Hospitalization and peridischarge time points represent important opportunities to address deficits in the documentation of goals and provision of goal-concordant care for sepsis survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.