Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34730459›Full record

ArticleClinical rehabilitation2022

Setting meaningful goals in rehabilitation: A qualitative study on the experiences of clients and clinicians in working with a practical tool.

Elsbeth Littooij, Suzan Doodeman, Jasmijn Holla, Maaike Ouwerkerk, Lenneke Post, Ton Satink, Anne Marie Ter Steeg, Judith Vloothuis, Joost Dekker, Vincent de Groot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elsbeth LittooijAmsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center, Reade, the Netherlands.
Suzan DoodemanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands.
Jasmijn HollaAmsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center, Reade, the Netherlands.
Maaike OuwerkerkDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands.
Lenneke PostDepartment of Spiritual Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands.
Ton SatinkDepartment of Occupational Therapy & Research Group Neurorehabilitation, HAN University of Applied Sciences, the Netherlands.
Anne Marie Ter SteegAmsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center, Reade, the Netherlands.
Judith VloothuisAmsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center, Reade, the Netherlands.
Joost DekkerDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2027-0027
Vincent de GrootDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the experience of clients and clinicians in working with a tool to help set goals that are personally meaningful to rehabilitation clients.

designWe have applied the tool in the outpatient rehabilitation setting. Clients' and clinicians' experiences in working with the tool were evaluated in individual, semi-structured interviews and focus group interviews, respectively. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.

settingA university medical center and a rehabilitation center. SUBJECTS: Clients with a first-time stroke (

interventionThe tool to help set meaningful goals consisted of a session (i) to explore the client's fundamental beliefs, goals and attitudes and (ii) to identify a meaningful overall rehabilitation goal. The results of that session were used by the multidisciplinary rehabilitation team (iii) to help the client to set specific rehabilitation goals that served to achieve the meaningful overall rehabilitation goal.

resultsBoth clients and clinicians reported that the tool helped to set a meaningful overall rehabilitation goal and specific goals that became meaningful as they served to achieve the overall goal. This contributed to clients' intrinsic rehabilitation motivation. In some clients, the meaningfulness of the rehabilitation goals facilitated the process of behavior change. Both clients and clinicians made suggestions on how the tool could be further improved.

conclusionIn the opinion of both clients and clinicians, the tool does indeed result in goal setting that is personally meaningful. Further development, implementation and evaluation of the tool is warranted.

Indexed as

GoalsMotivationFocus GroupsHumansQualitative ResearchRehabilitation Centersbehavior changeGoal-settingmeaningmotivationrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID34730459
PMCPMC8850761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.