Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34730411›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2021

Evaluating

Solize Vosloo, Linxuan Huo, Christopher L Anderson, Zihan Dai, Maria Sevillano, Ameet Pinto

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparative metagenomics using pan-metagenomic graphs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Solize VoslooSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technologygrid.213917.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Linxuan HuoSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technologygrid.213917.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Christopher L AndersonDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern Universitygrid.261112.7, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Zihan DaiResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciencesgrid.9227.e, Beijing, China.
Maria SevillanoDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern Universitygrid.261112.7, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ameet PintoSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technologygrid.213917.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstructing microbial genomes from metagenomic short-read data can be challenging due to the unknown and uneven complexity of microbial communities. This complexity encompasses highly diverse populations, which often includes strain variants. Reconstructing high-quality genomes is a crucial part of the metagenomic workflow, as subsequent ecological and metabolic inferences depend on their accuracy, quality, and completeness. In contrast to microbial communities in other ecosystems, there has been no systematic assessment of genome-centric metagenomic workflows for drinking water microbiomes. In this study, we assessed the performance of a combination of assembly and binning strategies for time series drinking water metagenomes that were collected over 6 months. The goal of this study was to identify the combination of assembly and binning approaches that result in high-quality and -quantity metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), representing most of the sequenced metagenome. Our findings suggest that the metaSPAdes coassembly strategies had the best performance, as they resulted in larger and less fragmented assemblies, with at least 85% of the sequence data mapping to contigs greater than 1 kbp. Furthermore, a combination of metaSPAdes coassembly strategies and MetaBAT2 produced the highest number of medium-quality MAGs while capturing at least 70% of the metagenomes based on read recruitment. Utilizing different assembly/binning approaches also assists in the reconstruction of unique MAGs from closely related species that would have otherwise collapsed into a single MAG using a single workflow. Overall, our study suggests that leveraging multiple binning approaches with different metaSPAdes coassembly strategies may be required to maximize the recovery of good-quality MAGs.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArchaeaBacteriaDrinking WaterGenome, ArchaealGenome, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomeMetagenomicsMicrobiotaTime FactorsWater MicrobiologyWater QualityDrinking Waterdrinking watergenome-resolved metagenomicslongitudinal (time series) dataset

Identifiers

PMID34730411
PMCPMC8567270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.