ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2021
Evaluating
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- metaFun: An analysis pipeline for metagenomic big data with fast and unified functional searches.Gut microbes · 2026Article
- MeioBIOME: A snakemake workflow for the parallel analysis of meiofaunal genomes and host-associated bacteria/archaea.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Taxonomy bias in metagenome-assembled genome recovery.Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- African carnivore gut bacterial diversity and composition are associated with sample condition but not storage technique.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- 2Pipe starts with a question: matching you with the correct pipeline for MAG reconstruction.mSystems · 2026Review
- Genome-resolved insights into hydrocarbon-transforming and nitrate-reducing microbial communities from deep petroleum reservoir cores of the Nashpa Oil Field, Pakistan.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Evidence for Trace Gas Metabolism and Widespread Antibiotic Synthesis in an Abiotically Driven, Antarctic Soil Ecosystem.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
- Bin Chicken: targeted metagenomic coassembly for the efficient recovery of novel genomes.Nature methods · 2025Article
- Metagenomic source tracking after microbiota transplant therapy.Gut microbes · 2025Article
- Comparative metagenomics using pan-metagenomic graphs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Genome-Resolved Metagenomics of Rice Straw Degradation Experiments in Colombian Fields.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Highly-accurate prediction of colorectal cancer through low abundance uncultivated genomes recovered using metagenomic co-assembly and binning approach.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- An Evolutionary-Focused Review of the Holosporales (Alphaproteobacteria): Diversity, Host Interactions, and Taxonomic Re-ranking as Holosporineae Subord. Nov.Microbial ecology · 2025Review
- Metagenomic CRISPR Array Analysis Tool: a novel graph-based approach to finding CRISPR arrays in metagenomic datasets.microLife · 2025Article
- Leveraging artificial intelligence community analytics and nanopore metagenomic surveillance to monitor early enteropathogen outbreaks.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Deciphering Toxic Pollutants Breakdown Potential in Microbial Community of Chumathang Hot Spring, Ladakh, India via Shotgun Metagenome Sequencing.Current microbiology · 2024Article
- Source-to-tap investigation of the occurrence of nontuberculous mycobacteria in a full-scale chloraminated drinking water system.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- New Drinking Water Genome Catalog Identifies a Globally Distributed Bacterial Genus Adapted to Disinfected Drinking Water Systems.Environmental science & technology · 2024Article
- Time-series metagenomics reveals changing protistan ecology of a temperate dimictic lake.Microbiome · 2024Article
- Host DNA depletion methods and genome-centric metagenomics of bovine hindmilk microbiome.mSphere · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reconstructing microbial genomes from metagenomic short-read data can be challenging due to the unknown and uneven complexity of microbial communities. This complexity encompasses highly diverse populations, which often includes strain variants. Reconstructing high-quality genomes is a crucial part of the metagenomic workflow, as subsequent ecological and metabolic inferences depend on their accuracy, quality, and completeness. In contrast to microbial communities in other ecosystems, there has been no systematic assessment of genome-centric metagenomic workflows for drinking water microbiomes. In this study, we assessed the performance of a combination of assembly and binning strategies for time series drinking water metagenomes that were collected over 6 months. The goal of this study was to identify the combination of assembly and binning approaches that result in high-quality and -quantity metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), representing most of the sequenced metagenome. Our findings suggest that the metaSPAdes coassembly strategies had the best performance, as they resulted in larger and less fragmented assemblies, with at least 85% of the sequence data mapping to contigs greater than 1 kbp. Furthermore, a combination of metaSPAdes coassembly strategies and MetaBAT2 produced the highest number of medium-quality MAGs while capturing at least 70% of the metagenomes based on read recruitment. Utilizing different assembly/binning approaches also assists in the reconstruction of unique MAGs from closely related species that would have otherwise collapsed into a single MAG using a single workflow. Overall, our study suggests that leveraging multiple binning approaches with different metaSPAdes coassembly strategies may be required to maximize the recovery of good-quality MAGs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.