Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34730270›Full record

ReviewIntegrated environmental assessment and management2022

Moving persistence assessments into the 21st century: A role for weight-of-evidence and overall persistence.

Aaron D Redman, Jens Bietz, John W Davis, Delina Lyon, Erin Maloney, Amelie Ott, Jens C Otte, Frédéric Palais, John R Parsons, Neil Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Making persistence assessment work: Now and in the future.Integrated environmental assessment and management · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aaron D RedmanExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc., Annandale, New Jersey, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5933-7906
Jens BietzClariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH, Sulzbach, Germany.
John W DavisDow, Inc., Midland, Michigan, USA.
Delina LyonShell Oil Company, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2291-9048
Erin MaloneyShell Oil Company, Houston, Texas, USA.
Amelie OttNewcastle University, School of Engineering, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Jens C OtteBASF SE, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
Frédéric PalaisSOLVAY, HSE PRA-PS, RICL-Antenne de Genas, Saint-Fons, Cedex, France.
John R ParsonsInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1785-3627
Neil WangTotalEnergies Marketing & Services, Paris la Défense, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing the persistence of chemicals in the environment is a key element in existing regulatory frameworks to protect human health and ecosystems. Persistence in the environment depends on many fate processes, including abiotic and biotic transformations and physical partitioning, which depend on substances' physicochemical properties and environmental conditions. A main challenge in persistence assessment is that existing frameworks rely on simplistic and reductionist evaluation schemes that may lead substances to be falsely assessed as persistent or the other way around-to be falsely assessed as nonpersistent. Those evaluation schemes typically assess persistence against degradation half-lives determined in single-compartment simulation tests or against degradation levels measured in stringent screening tests. Most of the available test methods, however, do not apply to all types of substances, especially substances that are poorly soluble, complex in composition, highly sorptive, or volatile. In addition, the currently applied half-life criteria are derived mainly from a few legacy persistent organic pollutants, which do not represent the large diversity of substances entering the environment. Persistence assessment would undoubtedly benefit from the development of more flexible and holistic evaluation schemes including new concepts and methods. A weight-of-evidence (WoE) approach incorporating multiple influencing factors is needed to account for chemical fate and transformation in the whole environment so as to assess overall persistence. The present paper's aim is to begin to develop an integrated assessment framework that combines multimedia approaches to organize and interpret data using a clear WoE approach to allow for a more consistent, transparent, and thorough assessment of persistence. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:868-887. © 2021 ExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Indexed as

EcotoxicologyEnvironmental MonitoringEcosystemEnvironmental PollutionHumansRisk AssessmentDegradationIntegrated framework for persistence assessmentMultimedia fate and transport modelOverall persistenceWeight-of-evidence

Identifiers

PMID34730270
PMCPMC9299815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.