Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34729917›Full record

Observational studyInternational wound journal2022

Pressure injury prevention practices among medical surgical nurses in a tertiary hospital: An observational and chart audit study.

Zhaoyu Li, Andrea P Marshall, Frances Lin, Yanming Ding, Wendy Chaboyer

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International wound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhaoyu LiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6231-6209
Andrea P MarshallSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7692-403X
Frances LinSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8735-5469
Yanming DingNursing Department, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4860-472X
Wendy ChaboyerNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9528-7814
Griffith University · AUPeking University · CN

Funding

Griffith University Postgraduate Scholarships
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pressure injuries are frequently occurring adverse events in hospitals, negatively impacting patient safety and quality of care. Most pressure injuries are avoidable if effective prevention strategies are used. However, the extent to which various settings influence their use of prevention strategies is unknown. The aim of this study was to describe and compare pressure injury prevention strategies used by medical and surgical nurses in the Chinese context. In this observational study, we used semi-structured observations with chart audits to collect data in two medical and two surgical wards in a tertiary hospital from June to December 2020. Observations were patient-focused; any prevention practices the patient received were recorded, and a chart audit was used to identify documented prevention strategies. The frequency of each prevention strategy was reported, and differences between medical and surgical wards were analysed using independent t-test or χ

Indexed as

Pressure UlcerHumansRisk AssessmentTertiary Care Centerschart auditnurseobservationpressure injury/ulcerprevention

Identifiers

PMID34729917
PMCPMC9284631
OpenAlexW3209125953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.