ArticleNMR in biomedicine2022
Improving hyperpolarized
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative evaluation of supervised and unsupervised deep learning strategies for denoising hyperpolarizedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Functional Pulmonary Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Article
- A thermally polarized, dissolved-phaseJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2025Article
- UltrasensitiveAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Improved Diffusion-Weighted HyperpolarizedAcademic radiology · 2024Article
- Quantifying abnormal alveolar microstructure in cystic fibrosis lung disease via hyperpolarizedJournal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2024Article
- Analytical corrections for BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Diffusion weighted hyperpolarizedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleHyperpolarized (HP)
methodsAn analytical expression for ADC uncertainty was derived from the Stejskal-Tanner equation and simplified Bloch equations appropriate for HP media. Parameters in the model were maximum b-value (b
resultsThe analytical model provides a lower bound on ADC uncertainty and predicts that decreased signal-to-noise ratio yields increases in relative uncertainty
conclusionsHP
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.