Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34729662›Full record

ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2021

Preformulation Studies to Guide the Production of Medicines by Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing.

Ludmila A G Pinho, Ana Luiza Lima, Livia L Sa-Barreto, Tais Gratieri, Guilherme M Gelfuso, Ricardo Neves Marreto, Marcilio Cunha-Filho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ludmila A G PinhoLaboratory of Food, Drug, and Cosmetics (LTMAC), School of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasília, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.
Ana Luiza LimaLaboratory of Food, Drug, and Cosmetics (LTMAC), School of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasília, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.
Livia L Sa-BarretoFaculty of Ceilândia, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, 72220-900, Brazil.
Tais GratieriLaboratory of Food, Drug, and Cosmetics (LTMAC), School of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasília, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.
Guilherme M GelfusoLaboratory of Food, Drug, and Cosmetics (LTMAC), School of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasília, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.
Ricardo Neves MarretoLaboratory of Nanosystems and Drug Delivery Devices (NanoSYS), School of Pharmacy, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, GO, 74605-170, Brazil.
Marcilio Cunha-FilhoLaboratory of Food, Drug, and Cosmetics (LTMAC), School of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasília, DF, 70910-900, Brazil. m@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing has demonstrated high potential for the production of personalized medicines. However, the heating at high temperatures inherent to this process causes unknown risks to the drug product's stability. The present study aimed to assess the use of a tailored preformulation protocol involving physicochemical assessments, including the rheological profiles of the samples, to guide the development of medicines by FDM 3D printing. For this, polymers commonly used in FDM printing, i.e., high impact polystyrene (HIPS), polylactic acid (PLA), and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and their common plasticizers (mineral oil, triethyl citrate, and glycerol, respectively) were evaluated using the thermolabile model drug isoniazid (INH). Samples were analyzed by chemical and physical assays. The results showed that although the drug could produce polymorphs under thermal processing, the polymeric matrix can be a protective element, and no polymorphic transformation was observed. However, incompatibilities between materials might impact their chemical, thermal, and rheological performances. In fact, ternary mixtures of INH, PLA, and TEC showed a major alteration in their viscoelastic behavior besides the chemical changes. On the other hand, the use of plasticizers for HIPS and PVA exhibited positive consequences in drug solubility and rheologic behavior, probably improving sample printability. Thus, the optimization of the FDM 3D printing based on preformulation studies can assist the choice of compatible components and seek suitable processing conditions to obtain pharmaceutical products.

Indexed as

ExcipientsTechnology, PharmaceuticalDrug LiberationPrinting, Three-DimensionalSolubilityExcipientsadditive manufacturingdrug-excipient compatibilityhot-melt extrusionrheologythermal analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.