Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34729652›Full record

SynthesisClinical rheumatology2022

A systematic review of clinical and preclinical evidences for Janus kinase inhibitors in large vessel vasculitis.

Upendra Rathore, Darpan Radheshyam Thakare, Pallavi Patro, Vikas Agarwal, Aman Sharma, Durga Prasanna Misra

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Upendra RathoreDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, 226014, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1658-8155
Darpan Radheshyam ThakareDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, 226014, India.
Pallavi PatroSchool of Telemedicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, 226014, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7645-5883
Vikas AgarwalDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, 226014, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4508-1233
Aman SharmaClinical Immunology and Rheumatology Services, Department of Internal Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0813-1243
Durga Prasanna MisraDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, 226014, India. durgapmisra@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5035-7396
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research Grant No 5/4/1-2/2019-NCD-II
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corticosteroid-sparing disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs are an area of active exploration in large vessel vasculitis (LVV), i.e., Takayasu arteritis (TAK) and Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA). The role of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors has been recently identified in different inflammatory rheumatic diseases. We conducted a systematic review of the use of JAK inhibitors in LVV across MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed Central, Cochrane database of controlled trials, clinicaltrials.gov, and major recent international conferences. We identified four cohort studies and ten case reports. The JAK inhibitors used in these studies were tofacitinib, baricitinib, and ruxolitinib. A cohort study in TAK compared 27 patients treated with tofacitinib with 26 others treated with methotrexate, with better clinical outcomes with tofacitinib but similar angiographic stabilization, relapses, corticosteroid-sparing effect, and adverse events in both groups. Most of the other studies favored clinical responses with JAK inhibitors in LVV but with a paucity of data on other outcomes. Most of the included studies were of moderate quality. Evidence from pre-clinical models of LVV as well as limited in vivo data in patients with TAK appears to suggest that JAK inhibition reduces adventitial fibrosis, intimal proliferation, and inflammatory T lymphocyte infiltration in the media as well as reduces resident memory T cells in the vascular wall (which are otherwise resistant to corticosteroids). Ongoing clinical trials of tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib in LVV shall help to further clarify the potential promise of JAK inhibitors for LVV (PROSPERO registration number CRD42021273359). KEY POINTS : •Tofacitinib appeared to associate with better clinical outcomes than methotrexate in TAK. •JAKinibs reduce adventitial fibrosis, intimal proliferation, and inflammatory vascular infiltrate in pre-clinical models of LVV. •Tofacitinib downregulates resident memory vascular T lymphocytes in pre-clinical models of LVV.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsGiant Cell ArteritisJanus Kinase InhibitorsTakayasu ArteritisCohort StudiesHumansMemory T CellsAntirheumatic AgentsJanus Kinase InhibitorsBaricitinibGiant cell arteritisJanus kinase inhibitorsRuxolitinibTakayasu arteritisTofacitinib

Identifiers

PMID34729652
OpenAlexW3209133121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.