ReviewJAC-antimicrobial resistance2021
The limited state of training on the social dimensions of antimicrobial resistance.
Review in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experiences of antibiotic use among Brazilian healthcare users: An exploratory study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraining is needed to increase awareness and understanding of the complex problem of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among professionals. However, AMR capacity building often does not stretch beyond the biomedical sciences, limiting interdisciplinary collaboration.
objectivesConsidering the relevance of including the social sciences, this scoping review assesses the state of training on the social dimensions of AMR.
methodsTwenty-eight training courses covering social dimensions of AMR were identified via a survey (
resultsBecause only 57% of the analysed training courses were fully focused on AMR, AMR was usually superficially covered, focusing on the biomedical basics and just mentioning some social aspects without using social science theories or experts. Only 3 of the 28 training courses covered AMR primarily from a social science perspective, while only 14% of the educators involved had social science expertise. Biomedical dimensions of AMR were covered twice as much as the social science dimensions. In the social science domain, institution and policy elements are most frequently covered, while transformations are the least covered.
conclusionsThere is a clear gap in educational resources on AMR, but moreover for social scientists wanting to engage in AMR, or for non-social scientists wanting to learn about the social dimensions of AMR from an interdisciplinary perspective. This gap needs to be bridged if we want social sciences to become a relevant partner in the struggle against AMR.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.