Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34729479›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2021

Effective connectivity extracts clinically relevant prognostic information from resting state activity in stroke.

Mohit H Adhikari, Joseph Griffis, Joshua S Siegel, Michel Thiebaut de Schotten, Gustavo Deco, Andrea Instabato, Matthieu Gilson, Maurizio Corbetta

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06387719 (Precursors of Binge Eating Disorder in a Clinical Sample of Adolescents With Obesity), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06387719 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Precursors of Binge Eating Disorder in a Clinical Sample of Adolescents With Obesity: Early MRI Markers of Brain Reward and Inhibition Processing Dysfunction

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFundació Sant Joan de DéuRan2023 to 2026Enrolled102ConditionsBinge-Eating Disorder, Obesity, Eating Disorders, BEDArmsMagnetic resonance imaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Mohit H AdhikariCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona 08018, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3404-8307
Joseph GriffisDepartment of Neurology, Radiology and Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5548-1169
Joshua S SiegelDepartment of Neurology, Radiology and Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5752-3641
Michel Thiebaut de SchottenBrain Connectivity and Behaviour Laboratory, Sorbonne Universities, Quai Saint Bernard 75005, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0329-1814
Gustavo DecoCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona 08018, Spain.
Andrea InstabatoCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona 08018, Spain.
Matthieu GilsonCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona 08018, Spain.
Maurizio CorbettaDepartment of Neurology, Radiology and Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.
Universitat Pompeu Fabra · ESWashington University in St. Louis · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

Stroke, Brain Networks, and BehaviorR01NS095741 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CORBETTA, MAURIZIO · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS095741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent resting-state functional MRI studies in stroke patients have identified two robust biomarkers of acute brain dysfunction: a reduction of inter-hemispheric functional connectivity between homotopic regions of the same network, and an abnormal increase of ipsi-lesional functional connectivity between task-negative and task-positive resting-state networks. Whole-brain computational modelling studies, at the individual subject level, using undirected effective connectivity derived from empirically measured functional connectivity, have shown a reduction of measures of integration and segregation in stroke as compared to healthy brains. Here we employ a novel method, first, to infer whole-brain directional effective connectivity from zero-lagged and lagged covariance matrices, then, to compare it to empirically measured functional connectivity for predicting stroke versus healthy status, and patient performance (zero, one, multiple deficits) across neuropsychological tests. We also investigated the accuracy of functional connectivity versus model effective connectivity in predicting the long-term outcome from acute measures. Both functional and effective connectivity predicted healthy from stroke individuals significantly better than the chance-level; however, accuracy for the effective connectivity was significantly higher than for functional connectivity at 1- to 2-week, 3-month and 1-year post-stroke. Predictive functional connections mainly included those reported in previous studies (within-network inter-hemispheric and between task-positive and -negative networks intra-hemispherically). Predictive effective connections included additional between-network links. Effective connectivity was a better predictor than functional connectivity of the number of behavioural domains in which patients suffered deficits, both at 2-week and 1-year post-onset of stroke. Interestingly, patient deficits at 1-year time-point were better predicted by effective connectivity values at 2 weeks rather than at 1-year time-point. Our results thus demonstrate that the second-order statistics of functional MRI resting-state activity at an early stage of stroke, derived from a whole-brain effective connectivity, estimated in a model fitted to reproduce the propagation of neuronal activity, has pertinent information for clinical prognosis.

Indexed as

classificationeffective connectivityfunctional connectivitywhole-brain modelling

Identifiers

PMID34729479
PMCPMC8557690
OpenAlexW3211247205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.