ArticleCentral European journal of urology2021
Is ERCC1 a prognostic biomarker for urothelial cancer following radical cystectomy? A long-term analysis.
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers and Tumor Antigens for Targeted Therapy in Urothelial Carcinoma.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionExcision repair cross-complementation 1 protein (ERCC1) plays a vital role in cancer cells enabling DNA repair via nucleotide excision repair. Thus, we hypothesized whether expression of this protein may be utilized as a prognostic marker in patients after radical cystectomy. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe final analysis involved 123 patients with urothelial bladder carcinoma who underwent radical cystectomy with bilateral lymphadenectomy. The median follow-up time was equal to 853 days. ERCC1 status was evaluated immunohistochemically with the application of tissue microarrays.
resultsPositive ERCC1 expression was noted in 46% of the studied cases. Among the analyzed clinical and pathological factors, we could not establish a statistically significant correlation with ERCC1. Similarly, survival curves were statistically indifferent in patients with tumors categorized according to both expression categories. We did not confirm a prognostic value of ERCC1 in the multivariate regression analysis.
conclusionsERCC1 expression does not influence the overall survival of patients with urothelial bladder carcinoma after radical cystectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.