ArticleCentral European journal of urology2021
Analysis of the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging and clinical parameters in the detection of prostate cancer in the first systematic biopsy combined with targeted cognitive biopsy.
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of Prostate Volume on the Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) in a Real-World Setting.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe study aimed to assess the suitability of multiparametric magnetic resonance prostate imaging (mpMRI) in combination with clinical parameters [prostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination (DRE)] in the identification of men at risk of the presence of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, Gleason Score ≥3+4) in the cognitive fusion with systematic prostate biopsy. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated a population of 215 biopsy - naive patients with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer. The results of mpMRI, DRE, PSA and biopsy were analyzed. MpMRI of the prostate according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v.2.0 scheme preceded cognitive fusion and systematic transrectal prostate biopsy. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis (MVA) was used to identify the variables determining the risk of detecting PCa overall and csPCa.
resultsIn MVA, it was established that the combination of variables such as PSA level [odds ratio (OR) 1.195; p = 0.002], PI-RADS ≥3 (OR 7.7; p = 0.002), prostate volume (OR 0.98; p = 0.017) significantly determines the probability of PCa detection in biopsy, while for csPCa it is PSA level (OR 1.14; p = 0.004), DRE (+) (OR 5.75; p <0.001), PI-RADS ≥4 (OR 6.5; p <0.001). Analysis of mpMRI diagnostic value for PI-RADS ≥4 revealed better sensitivity (88.9% vs 82.6%) and better negative predictive value (NPV) (94.5% vs 82.4%) for detection of csPCa than for PCa overall.
conclusionsMpMRI results combining with DRE and PSA parameters help to identify men at high - or low risk of csPCa detection in the first - time biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.