Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34729216›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of urology2021

Human kidney injury molecule-1 as a urine biomarker differentiating urothelial and renal cell carcinoma.

Łukasz Białek, Michał Niemczyk, Katarzyna Czerwińska, Mateusz Nowak, Anna Sadowska, Tomasz Borkowski, Piotr Radziszewski, Jakub Dobruch, Piotr Kryst, Sławomir Poletajew

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Łukasz BiałekI Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Michał NiemczykDepartment of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna CzerwińskaDepartment of Transplantation Medicine, Nephrology and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Mateusz NowakDepartment of Urology, St. Lucas Hospital, Tarnów, Poland.
Anna SadowskaDepartment of Transplantation Medicine, Nephrology and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Tomasz BorkowskiDepartment of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr RadziszewskiDepartment of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Jakub DobruchI Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr KrystSecond Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Sławomir PoletajewSecond Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLPostgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUrine concentration of human kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) is suggested to be increased in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, it has never been tested in patients with urothelial tumors, while preoperative differentiation between RCC and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) plays an essential role in therapeutic decisions.The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of urinary KIM-1 expression in preoperative differentiation between RCC and urothelial carcinoma (UC). MATERIAL AND

methodsSixty-four participants were enrolled in the study, including 30 patients with RCC and 27 with UC (16 with UTUC and 11 with bladder tumor). Preoperative urinary KIM-1 levels were measured using a commercially available ELISA kit and normalized to urinary creatinine levels.

resultsThe median concentration of urinary KIM-1 normalized to urinary creatinine was lower in patients with RCC compared to UC (1.35 vs 1.86 ng/mg creatinine, p = 0.04). The comparison between RCC and UTUC shows even more significant difference (1.33 vs 2.23 ng/mg creatinine, p = 0.02). Urinary KIM-1 concentration did not correlate with tumor stage nor grade in any of the groups. ROC analysis to identify UC revealed AUC of 0.657 with sensitivity 33.3% and specificity 96.7% at the cut-off value of 3.226 ng/mg creatinine. Among patients with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m², ROC analysis to detect UC achieved AUC of 0.727 with sensitivity 69.5% and specificity 70.2%.

conclusionsUrine KIM-1 can potentially differentiate UC from RCC. However, a wide range of observed results and limited sensitivity and specificity requires caution in making clinical decisions before confirmatory studies.

Indexed as

biomarkerhKIM-1kidney cancerurothelial cancer

Identifiers

PMID34729216
PMCPMC8552939
OpenAlexW3208745089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.