Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34729211›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2021

Monkey see, monkey feel? Marmoset reactions towards conspecifics' arousal.

Francisco Edvaldo de Oliveira Terceiro, Erik P Willems, Arrilton Araújo, Judith M Burkart

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Francisco Edvaldo de Oliveira TerceiroDepartment of Physiology and Behaviour, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, PO Box 1511, Campus Universitário, 59078-970 Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9071-604X
Erik P WillemsDepartment of Anthropology, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland.
Arrilton AraújoDepartment of Physiology and Behaviour, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, PO Box 1511, Campus Universitário, 59078-970 Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Judith M BurkartDepartment of Anthropology, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6229-525X
University of Zurich · CHUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consolation has been observed in several species, including marmoset monkeys, but it is often unclear to what extent they are empathy-based. Marmosets perform well in at least two of three components of empathy-based consolation, namely understanding others and prosociality, but it is unknown to what extent they show matching with others. We, therefore, tested whether non-aroused individuals would become aroused themselves when encountering an aroused group member (indicated by piloerection of the tail). We found a robust contagion effect: group members were more likely to show piloerection themselves after having encountered an aroused versus relaxed conspecific. Moreover, group members offered consolation behaviours (affiliative approaches) towards the aroused fellow group members rather than the latter requesting it. Importantly, this pattern was shown by both aroused and non-aroused individuals, which suggests that they did not do this to reduce their own arousal but rather to console the individual in distress. We conclude that marmosets have all three components of empathy-based consolation. These results are in line with observations in another cooperative breeder, the prairie vole.

Indexed as

consolationcontagion of emotional arousalempathysympathetic concernsympathy

Identifiers

PMID34729211
PMCPMC8548797
OpenAlexW3208346371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.