Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34728838›Full record

ArticleAnnales medico-psychologiques2023

[Psychological impact of involvement of medical and psychological emergency unit professionals in the medical and psychological care system of the COVID-19 epidemic].

Élise Neff, Alexis Vancappel, Laura Moioli, François Ducrocq, Wissam El-Hage, Nathalie Prieto, Gaëlle Abgrall

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Annales medico-psychologiques, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Élise NeffCellule d'urgence médico-psychologique, SAMU, groupe hospitalier Necker-Enfants malades, Paris, France.
Alexis VancappelInserm, UMR 1253, iBrain, université de Tours, Tours, France.
Laura MoioliCellule d'urgence médico-psychologique, SAMU, groupe hospitalier Necker-Enfants malades, Paris, France.
François DucrocqCellule d'urgence médico-psychologique, SAMU, CHR Lille, Lille, France.
Wissam El-HageInserm, UMR 1253, iBrain, université de Tours, Tours, France.
Nathalie PrietoCellule d'urgence médico-psychologique, SAMU, hôpital Édouard Herriot, HCL, Lyon, France.
Gaëlle AbgrallCellule d'urgence médico-psychologique, SAMU, groupe hospitalier Necker-Enfants malades, Paris, France.
Université de Tours · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences have put into great difficulty health professionals, and the general population, fostering the emergence of various psychological and psychiatric disorders. Medical and psychological emergency units' mission is the medical and psychological emergency care of people impacted during a traumatic event. Given their expertise in crisis management, they set up an important medical and psychological support system adapted to the health crisis' characteristics. The unusual modalities of intervention, the specific clinic that these professionals faced in this context of great tension may have unsettled workers and generate a psychological impact. This study aims to assess the existence of such repercussions among medical and psychological emergency unit professionals involved in this new system. Method: In all, 313 medical and psychological emergency unit professionals agreed to participate at the online survey. They filled surveys and visual analog scales assessing the difficulties encountered in the system, as well as their level of satisfaction, post-traumatic stress, burnout, level of anxiety and depression and coping strategies put in place. Results: Results show few significant emotional difficulties. However higher scores are found among women, among professionals who felt a negative impact on their personal lives, as well as for those who thought they had been infected with COVID-19. The establishment of coping strategies such as active coping, planning, expressing feelings, positive reinterpretation and acceptance helped to decrease the level of emotional complexities and brought more compassionate satisfaction. We note that participants with more medical and psychological emergency unit experience tend to show less emotional hardship and more compassionate satisfaction. It appears that older as well as younger professionals have lower burnout scores, as do workers who conducted more interviews for the same person. Likewise, participants who were satisfied of the system organization and of the support - a majority in this study - report less emotional challenges and more compassionate satisfaction. Conclusion: Psychological impact in this new system among medical and psychological emergency unit professionals is overall low. It appears that some coping strategies, perceived usefulness, satisfaction with the organization and the received support are associated with a lower level of emotional difficulties. A supportive framework and an operative organization of the medical and psychological emergency unit system in times of crisis has a protective effect on the participants.

Indexed as

Covid-19FeedbackHealth professionalMedical and psychological emergency unitPsychic adjustment

Identifiers

PMID34728838
PMCPMC8553651
OpenAlexW3206341780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.