ArticleScientific reports2021
Measurement of chest wall motion using a motion capture system with the one-pitch phase analysis method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The lateral habenula regulates stress-related respiratory responses via the monoaminergic system.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2025Article
- Simultaneous high-pitch multi-energy CT pulmonary angiography using a dual-source photon-counting-detector CT: A phantom experiment.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Breathing Chest Wall Kinematics Assessment through a Single Digital Camera: A Feasibility Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Investigating Stroke Effects on Respiratory Parameters Using a Wearable Device: A Pilot Study on Hemiplegic Patients.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spirometry is a standard method for assessing lung function. However, its use is challenging in some patients, and it has limitations such as risk of infection and inability to assess regional chest wall motion. A three-dimensional motion capture system using the one-pitch phase analysis (MCO) method can facilitate high precision measurement of moving objects in real-time in a non-contacting manner. In this study, the MCO method was applied to examine thoraco-abdominal (TA) wall motion for assessing pulmonary function. We recruited 48 male participants, and all underwent spirometry and chest wall motion measurement with the MCO method. A significant positive correlation was observed between the vital capacity (Spearman's ρ = 0.68, p < 0.0001), forced vital capacity (Spearman's ρ = 0.62, p < 0.0001), and tidal volume (Spearman's ρ = 0.61, p < 0.0001) of spirometry and the counterpart parameters of MCO method. Moreover, the MCO method could detect regional rib cage and abdomen compartment contributions and could assess TA asynchrony, indicating almost complete synchronous movement (phase angle for each compartment: - 5.05° to 3.86°). These findings suggest that this technique could examine chest wall motion, and may be effective in analyzing chest wall volume changes and pulmonary function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.