ArticleScientific reports2021
Differential urine proteome analysis of a ventilator-induced lung injury rat model by label-free quantitative and parallel reaction monitoring proteomics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Label-Free Targeted Proteomics Data Analysis Workflow Selection - Benchmarking AI-based and Data-Driven Approaches.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- Ventilator-induced lung injury in rat models: are they all equal in the race?Laboratory animal research · 2025Review
- Quantitative urinary proteome analysis reveals potential biomarkers for disease activity of Behcet's disease uveitis.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Urine Proteomic Signatures of Mild Hypothermia Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rats.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2024Article
- Proteome profiling of hippocampus reveals the neuroprotective effect of mild hypothermia on global cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Prognostic Biomarkers Based on Proteomic Technology in COPD: A Recent Review.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023Review
- Proteome analysis of urinary biomarkers in a cigarette smoke-induced COPD rat model.Respiratory research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Urine is a promising resource for biomarker research. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate potential urinary biomarkers to monitor the disease activity of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). In the discovery phase, a label-free data-dependent acquisition (DDA) quantitative proteomics method was used to profile the urinary proteomes of VILI rats. For further validation, the differential proteins were verified by parallel reaction monitoring (PRM)-targeted quantitative proteomics. In total, 727 high-confidence proteins were identified with at least 1 unique peptide (FDR ≤ 1%). Compared to the control group, 110 proteins (65 upregulated, 45 downregulated) were significantly changed in the VILI group (1.5-fold change, P < 0.05). The canonical pathways and protein-protein interaction analyses revealed that the differentially expressed proteins were enriched in multiple functions, including oxidative stress and inflammatory responses. Finally, thirteen proteins were identified as candidate biomarkers for VILI by PRM validation. Among these PRM-validated proteins, AMPN, MEP1B, LYSC1, DPP4 and CYC were previously reported as lung-associated disease biomarkers. SLC31, MEP1A, S15A2, NHRF1, XPP2, GGT1, HEXA, and ATPB were newly discovered in this study. Our results suggest that the urinary proteome might reflect the pathophysiological changes associated with VILI. These differential proteins are potential urinary biomarkers for the activity of VILI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.