Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34728706›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Using explainable machine learning to identify patients at risk of reattendance at discharge from emergency departments.

F P Chmiel, D K Burns, M Azor, F Borca, M J Boniface, Z D Zlatev, N M White, T W V Daniels, M Kiuber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

F P ChmielSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. francispeterchmiel@gmail.com.
D K BurnsSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
M AzorUniversity Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
F BorcaUniversity Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
M J BonifaceSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Z D ZlatevSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
N M WhiteSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
T W V DanielsDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
M KiuberEmergency Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short-term reattendances to emergency departments are a key quality of care indicator. Identifying patients at increased risk of early reattendance could help reduce the number of missed critical illnesses and could reduce avoidable utilization of emergency departments by enabling targeted post-discharge intervention. In this manuscript, we present a retrospective, single-centre study where we created and evaluated an extreme gradient boosting decision tree model trained to identify patients at risk of reattendance within 72 h of discharge from an emergency department (University Hospitals Southampton Foundation Trust, UK). Our model was trained using 35,447 attendances by 28,945 patients and evaluated on a hold-out test set featuring 8847 attendances by 7237 patients. The set of attendances from a given patient appeared exclusively in either the training or the test set. Our model was trained using both visit level variables (e.g., vital signs, arrival mode, and chief complaint) and a set of variables available in a patients electronic patient record, such as age and any recorded medical conditions. On the hold-out test set, our highest performing model obtained an AUROC of 0.747 (95% CI 0.722-0.773) and an average precision of 0.233 (95% CI 0.194-0.277). These results demonstrate that machine-learning models can be used to classify patients, with moderate performance, into low and high-risk groups for reattendance. We explained our models predictions using SHAP values, a concept developed from coalitional game theory, capable of explaining predictions at an attendance level. We demonstrated how clustering techniques (the UMAP algorithm) can be used to investigate the different sub-groups of explanations present in our patient cohort.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningAdolescentAdultAftercareAgedCritical IllnessElectronic Health RecordsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargePatient Readmission

Identifiers

PMID34728706
PMCPMC8563762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.