ArticleScientific reports2021
Using explainable machine learning to identify patients at risk of reattendance at discharge from emergency departments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable SHAP-space fall risk profiling from electronic health records for inpatient prevention planning.npj health systems · 2026Article
- SeqBoost: a sequential explainable model for predicting ED revisits within 72 hours.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for 30-Day Emergency Department Revisits in a Medically Underserved Tertiary Hospital: Formative Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Performance comparison of artificial intelligence models in predicting 72-h emergency department unscheduled return visits.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Development of interpretable machine learning models to predict in-hospital prognosis of acute heart failure patients.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Diagnosing an overcrowded emergency department from its Electronic Health Records.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Explainable prediction of node labels in multilayer networks: a case study of turnover prediction in organizations.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Machine learning models for predicting unscheduled return visits to an emergency department: a scoping review.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Exploring metabolic anomalies in COVID-19 and post-COVID-19: a machine learning approach with explainable artificial intelligence.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Explainable AI for clinical and remote health applications: a survey on tabular and time series data.Artificial intelligence review · 2023Article
- Using explainable machine learning to characterise data drift and detect emergent health risks for emergency department admissions during COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Using machine learning to identify frequent attendance at accident and emergency services in Lanarkshire.Digital healthArticle
- The application of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in electronic health record research: A scoping review.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short-term reattendances to emergency departments are a key quality of care indicator. Identifying patients at increased risk of early reattendance could help reduce the number of missed critical illnesses and could reduce avoidable utilization of emergency departments by enabling targeted post-discharge intervention. In this manuscript, we present a retrospective, single-centre study where we created and evaluated an extreme gradient boosting decision tree model trained to identify patients at risk of reattendance within 72 h of discharge from an emergency department (University Hospitals Southampton Foundation Trust, UK). Our model was trained using 35,447 attendances by 28,945 patients and evaluated on a hold-out test set featuring 8847 attendances by 7237 patients. The set of attendances from a given patient appeared exclusively in either the training or the test set. Our model was trained using both visit level variables (e.g., vital signs, arrival mode, and chief complaint) and a set of variables available in a patients electronic patient record, such as age and any recorded medical conditions. On the hold-out test set, our highest performing model obtained an AUROC of 0.747 (95% CI 0.722-0.773) and an average precision of 0.233 (95% CI 0.194-0.277). These results demonstrate that machine-learning models can be used to classify patients, with moderate performance, into low and high-risk groups for reattendance. We explained our models predictions using SHAP values, a concept developed from coalitional game theory, capable of explaining predictions at an attendance level. We demonstrated how clustering techniques (the UMAP algorithm) can be used to investigate the different sub-groups of explanations present in our patient cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.