ArticleScientific reports2021
Microinjection of pruritogens in NGF-sensitized human skin.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanisms of pruritus and advances in traditional Chinese medicine therapy (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Neuro-immune Crosstalk in Atopic Dermatitis: A Multiaxial Regulatory Network and Novel Therapeutic Perspectives.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
- An Overview of Growth Factors as the Potential Link between Psoriasis and Metabolic Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Neurotrophins: Neuroimmune Interactions in Human Atopic Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Chronic Nodular Prurigo: An Update on the Pathogenesis and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Increased Epidermal Nerve Growth Factor without Small-Fiber Neuropathy in Dermatomyositis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Single intradermal injections of nerve growth factor (NGF) evoke prolonged but temporally distinct sensitization patterns to somatosensory stimuli. Focal administration of the non-histaminergic pruritogen cowhage but not histamine resulted in elevated itch at day 21 after NGF administration. Here, we injected bovine adrenal medulla peptide 8-22 (BAM8-22), β-alanine (β-ALA) and endothelin-1 (ET-1) into NGF-treated skin of 11 healthy volunteers and investigated the corresponding itch/pain and flare reactions. β-ALA was the weakest pruritogen, while BAM8-22 and ET-1 were equally potent as histamine. NGF did not sensitize itch or flare reactions induced by any compound, but injection and evoked pain were increased at day 21 and 49. The involvement of histamine H1 receptors in itch was explored in eight subjects after oral cetirizine. ET-1-induced itch and flare were significantly reduced. BAM8-22 and β-ALA itch were not affected, but flare responses after BAM8-22 reduced by 50%. The results indicate that a single NGF injection does not sensitize for experimentally induced itch but increases pain upon pruritogen injection. In healthy humans, pruritic and algetic processing appear differentially regulated by NGF. However, in patients suffering chronic itch, prolonged elevation of NGF-levels under inflammatory conditions may contribute to elevated itch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.