Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34728683›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Comparative assessment of nutritional, thermal, rheological and functional properties of nine Australian lupin cultivars.

Kishor Mazumder, Biswajit Biswas, Philip G Kerr, Christopher Blanchard, Afia Nabila, Mimi Golder, Mohammad Gulzarul Aziz, Asgar Farahnaky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Compositional Attributes of Blue Lupin (Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. White Lupine (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Investigations on the Transfer of Quinolizidine Alkaloids fromJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kishor MazumderDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Biological Science and Technology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, 7408, Bangladesh. kmazumder@just.edu.bd.
Biswajit BiswasDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Biological Science and Technology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, 7408, Bangladesh.
Philip G KerrSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 2650, Australia. pkerr@csu.edu.au.
Christopher BlanchardSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 2650, Australia.
Afia NabilaDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Science and Technology Chittagong, Chittagong, 4202, Bangladesh.
Mimi GolderPharmacy Discipline, Life Science School, Khulna University, Khulna, 9208, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Gulzarul AzizDepartment of Food Technology and Rural Industries, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, 2202, Bangladesh.
Asgar FarahnakySchool of Biomedical Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 2650, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lupin holds an important place among the legumes and the utilization of lupin as a dietary protein source is an excellent environmentally friendly alternative to animal-based products for human nutrition. In the present study, nutritional, thermal, rheological and functional properties of nine Australian lupin cultivars have been assayed in order to find the most valuable one, both nutritiously and industrially. The set comprised six Lupinus angustifolius L. viz., Barlock, Gunyadi, Jenabillup, Jindalee, Jurien, Mandelup and three Lupinus albus L. viz., Luxor, Rosetta, WK388 cultivars. The tests included analysis of color, macronutrient and micronutrient composition, pasting, textural and thermal properties, electrophoretic profile of protein isolates, swelling power, water and oil absorption capacity, emulsifying capacity, emulsion stability, creaming stability, foaming capacity and stability of the cultivars' dehulled seed flours. The results indicated substantial variation in macro and micro-nutritional value as well as satisfactory swelling ability, solubility, surface hydrophobicity, foaming ability, emulsifying capacity and gelation property of lupin flours. Superior nutritional, thermal, rheological and functional potential was demonstrated by the L. albus cultivars compared to the L. angustifolius cultivars with the exception of Mandelup.

Indexed as

Nutritive ValueRheologyAustraliaDietary ProteinsFlourHumansLupinusPlant ProteinsSeedsDietary ProteinsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID34728683
PMCPMC8564527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.