Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34728662›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A system for reporting and evaluating adverse drug reactions of herbal medicine in Taiwan from 1998 to 2016.

Hen-Hong Chang, Su-Yin Chiang, Pei-Chun Chen, Chia-Han Tsai, Rong-Chi Yang, Chiu-Lin Tsai, Tsung-Hsiu Wu, Yow-Wen Hsieh, Yu-Chun Lin, Yung-Te Kuo and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Impacts ofJournal of toxicology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Hen-Hong ChangGraduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, and Chinese Medicine Research Center, China Medical University, No. 91, Hsueh-Shih Road, North District, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan, ROC. tcmchh55@gmail.com.
Su-Yin ChiangSchool of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Pei-Chun ChenDepartment of Public Health, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chia-Han TsaiDivision of Chinese Internal Medicine, Department of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Rong-Chi YangSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chiu-Lin TsaiTraditional Chinese Medicine Pharmacy, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Tsung-Hsiu WuTraditional Chinese Medicine Pharmacy, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yow-Wen HsiehDepartment of Pharmacy, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yu-Chun LinDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chinese Medicine Department, China Medicine University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yung-Te KuoTraditional Chinese Medicine Pharmacy, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Kuan-Chung ChenGraduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, and Chinese Medicine Research Center, China Medical University, No. 91, Hsueh-Shih Road, North District, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan, ROC.
Hsueh-Ting ChuDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, College of Computer Science, Asia University, No. 500, Lioufeng Road, Wufeng, Taichung, 41354, Taiwan, ROC. htchu@asia.edu.tw.
China Medical University · TWAsia University · TWChang Gung University · TWChina Medical University Hospital · TWLinkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWTaipei City Hospital · TW

Funding

China Medical University Hospital DMR-109-005Ministry of Education CMRC-CMA-6Ministry of Health and Welfare MOHW105-CMAP-M-114-000314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Taiwan Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting System for Herbal Medicine (TADRRS-HM) has systematically documented suspected adverse events from adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports from 1998 (prior to its formal establishment in 2001) and evaluates safety profiles of herbal medicines. This article describes findings from 2079 ADR reports filed between 1998 and 2016: 941 reports involved single herbs and 87 involved folk herbals; 842 were generated from clinical trials, while 209 ADR reports involving foods, health foods, dietary supplement foods and herbal cuisine were grouped as Other. Severity assessments using the Modified Hartwig and Siegel scale classified 72.4% of ADRs as mild, 17.4% as moderate and 6.5% as severe. System Organ Class classification of the ADRs identified gastrointestinal system disorders as the most common (33.4%), followed by skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (21.2%). The TADRRS-HM records indicate that herbal medicines may cause a wide range of ADRs. Aconiti Radix, Xiao-Qing-Long-Tang, and Datura suaveolens were the most commonly reported single herb, herbal formula, and folk herbal, respectively. The data indicate that herbal medicines may cause a wide range of ADRs. This system will confer long-term benefits for the development of Taiwan's herbal medicines adverse reaction database and facilitate epidemiological analysis.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHerbal MedicineHumansPharmacovigilancePhytotherapyPlants, MedicinalSkin DiseasesTaiwanTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID34728662
PMCPMC8564513
OpenAlexW3210102408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.