ArticleScientific reports2021
An integrative analysis of genomic and exposomic data for complex traits and phenotypic prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Illuminating the complex interplay of risk factors for depression symptoms within a large-scale US longitudinal cohort.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026Article
- When does accounting for gene-environment interactions improve complex trait prediction? A case study with Drosophila lifespan.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Cross-Ancestry Polygenic Prediction: Comparing Methods and Assessing Transferability Across Traits.Genetic epidemiology · 2026Article
- When does accounting for gene-environment interactions improve complex trait prediction? A case study withbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Improvement of polygenic modeling of blood pressure traits using lifestyle information in the UK Biobank.Genetics · 2025Article
- Advancing translational exposomics: bridging genome, exposome and personalized medicine.Human genomics · 2025Review
- Multi-omics approaches for understanding gene-environment interactions in noncommunicable diseases: techniques, translation, and equity issues.Human genomics · 2025Review
- Integrative multi-omics analysis to gain new insights into COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Gene-environment interactions within a precision environmental health framework.Cell genomics · 2024Review
- Unraveling phenotypic variance in metabolic syndrome through multi-omics.Human genetics · 2024Article
- Two-dimensional nanostructures based '-onics' and '-omics' in personalized medicine.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2022Review
- Integrative analysis of genomic and exposomic influences on youth mental health.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2022Article
- Systemic lupus erythematosus as a genetic disease.Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.) · 2022Article
- Lifestyle Modifies the Diabetes-Related Metabolic Risk, Conditional on Individual Genetic Differences.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Climate change, human health, and the exposome: Utilizing OMIC technologies to navigate an era of uncertainty.Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
- GxEsum: a novel approach to estimate the phenotypic variance explained by genome-wide GxE interaction based on GWAS summary statistics for biobank-scale data.Genome biology · 2021Article
- A Genetic Map of the Modern Urban Society of Amsterdam.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Complementary to the genome, the concept of exposome has been proposed to capture the totality of human environmental exposures. While there has been some recent progress on the construction of the exposome, few tools exist that can integrate the genome and exposome for complex trait analyses. Here we propose a linear mixed model approach to bridge this gap, which jointly models the random effects of the two omics layers on phenotypes of complex traits. We illustrate our approach using traits from the UK Biobank (e.g., BMI and height for N ~ 35,000) with a small fraction of the exposome that comprises 28 lifestyle factors. The joint model of the genome and exposome explains substantially more phenotypic variance and significantly improves phenotypic prediction accuracy, compared to the model based on the genome alone. The additional phenotypic variance captured by the exposome includes its additive effects as well as non-additive effects such as genome-exposome (gxe) and exposome-exposome (exe) interactions. For example, 19% of variation in BMI is explained by additive effects of the genome, while additional 7.2% by additive effects of the exposome, 1.9% by exe interactions and 4.5% by gxe interactions. Correspondingly, the prediction accuracy for BMI, computed using Pearson's correlation between the observed and predicted phenotypes, improves from 0.15 (based on the genome alone) to 0.35 (based on the genome and exposome). We also show, using established theories, that integrating genomic and exposomic data can be an effective way of attaining a clinically meaningful level of prediction accuracy for disease traits. In conclusion, the genomic and exposomic effects can contribute to phenotypic variation via their latent relationships, i.e. genome-exposome correlation, and gxe and exe interactions, and modelling these effects has a potential to improve phenotypic prediction accuracy and thus holds a great promise for future clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.