Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34728629›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Accurate recognition of colorectal cancer with semi-supervised deep learning on pathological images.

Gang Yu, Kai Sun, Chao Xu, Xing-Hua Shi, Chong Wu, Ting Xie, Run-Qi Meng, Xiang-He Meng, Kuan-Song Wang, Hong-Mei Xiao and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. CsDETC: detection and counting of small targetFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gang YuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, 410013, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3599-8985
Kai SunDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, 410013, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6232-2094
Chao XuDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3821-6187
Xing-Hua ShiDepartment of Computer & Information Sciences, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4662-3177
Chong WuDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8400-1785
Ting XieDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, 410013, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8742-3855
Run-Qi MengElectronic Information Science and Technology, School of Physics and Electronics, Central South University, 410083, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7833-4666
Xiang-He MengCenter for System Biology, Data Sciences and Reproductive Health, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, 410013, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8731-2899
Kuan-Song WangDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, 410078, Changsha, Hunan, China. 375527162@qq.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7828-2648
Hong-Mei XiaoCenter for System Biology, Data Sciences and Reproductive Health, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, 410013, Changsha, Hunan, China. hmxiao@csu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-8121-9498
Hong-Wen DengCenter for System Biology, Data Sciences and Reproductive Health, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, 410013, Changsha, Hunan, China. hdeng2@tulane.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0387-8818

Funding

Tulane COBRE in Cardiometabolic Diseases Clinical Research CoreP20GM109036 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI Ning Liu · 2016 to 2026
$25.3M
Trans-omics Integration of Multi-omics Studies for OsteoporosisU19AG055373 · NIA · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI Qi Zhao · 2017 to 2026
$24.3M
Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics for Precision Weight-Loss Diet InterventionsR01DK115679 · NIDDK · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI Lu Qi · 2018 to 2026
$5.3M
Epigenomewide DNA Methylation Study for Osteoporosis RiskR01AR059781 · NIAMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2012 to 2016
$3.1M
Decoding Methylation Mediated Epigenomic Contributions to Male OsteoporosisR01AR069055 · NIAMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
Integration of brain imaging with genomic and epigenomic dataR01MH104680 · NIMH · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D, DENG, HONG-WEN · 2014 to 2017
$2.1M
Integration of fMRI imaging, genomics, network and biological knowledgeR01MH107354 · NIMH · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI WANG, YU-PING · 2015 to 2018
$1.9M
Integration of multiscale genomic data for comprehensive analysis of complex diseR01GM109068 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI WANG, YU-PING · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR059781NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR069055NIA NIH HHS U19 AG055373NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK115679NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109036NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109068NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104680NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine-assisted pathological recognition has been focused on supervised learning (SL) that suffers from a significant annotation bottleneck. We propose a semi-supervised learning (SSL) method based on the mean teacher architecture using 13,111 whole slide images of colorectal cancer from 8803 subjects from 13 independent centers. SSL (~3150 labeled, ~40,950 unlabeled; ~6300 labeled, ~37,800 unlabeled patches) performs significantly better than the SL. No significant difference is found between SSL (~6300 labeled, ~37,800 unlabeled) and SL (~44,100 labeled) at patch-level diagnoses (area under the curve (AUC): 0.980 ± 0.014 vs. 0.987 ± 0.008, P value = 0.134) and patient-level diagnoses (AUC: 0.974 ± 0.013 vs. 0.980 ± 0.010, P value = 0.117), which is close to human pathologists (average AUC: 0.969). The evaluation on 15,000 lung and 294,912 lymph node images also confirm SSL can achieve similar performance as that of SL with massive annotations. SSL dramatically reduces the annotations, which has great potential to effectively build expert-level pathological artificial intelligence platforms in practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceColorectal NeoplasmsDeep LearningHumansLung NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisNeural Networks, ComputerROC CurveSupervised Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID34728629
PMCPMC8563931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.