Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34728455›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Predicting patient-level new-onset atrial fibrillation from population-based nationwide electronic health records: protocol of FIND-AF for developing a precision medicine prediction model using artificial intelligence.

Ramesh Nadarajah, Jianhua Wu, Alejandro F Frangi, David Hogg, Campbell Cowan, Chris Gale

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04657900 (Predicting Patient-level New Onset Atrial Fibrillation From Population-based Nationwide Electronic Health Records), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04657900 completednot on this map

Predicting Patient-level New Onset Atrial Fibrillation From Population-based Nationwide Electronic Health Records: A Precision Medicine Investigation Using Artificial Intelligence

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of LeedsRan2020 to 2023Enrolled140,000ConditionsAtrial FibrillationArmsObservational
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Screening for atrial fibrillation: a narrative review.The British journal of cardiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Machine learning in the detection and management of atrial fibrillation.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ramesh NadarajahLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK r.nadarajah@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9895-9356
Jianhua WuLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Alejandro F FrangiLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
David HoggSchool of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Campbell CowanDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Chris GaleLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
University of Leeds · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/20/12/34789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAtrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cardiovascular health problem: it is common, chronic and incurs substantial healthcare expenditure because of stroke. Oral anticoagulation reduces the risk of thromboembolic stroke in those at higher risk; but for a number of patients, stroke is the first manifestation of undetected AF. There is a rationale for the early diagnosis of AF, before the first complication occurs, but population-based screening is not recommended. Previous prediction models have been limited by their data sources and methodologies. An accurate model that uses existing routinely collected data is needed to inform clinicians of patient-level risk of AF, inform national screening policy and highlight predictors that may be amenable to primary prevention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will investigate the application of a range of deep learning techniques, including an adapted convolutional neural network, recurrent neural network and Transformer, on routinely collected primary care data to create a personalised model predicting the risk of new-onset AF over a range of time periods. The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)-GOLD dataset will be used for derivation, and the CPRD-AURUM dataset will be used for external geographical validation. Both comprise a sizeable representative population and are linked at patient-level to secondary care databases. The performance of the deep learning models will be compared against classic machine learning and traditional statistical predictive modelling methods. We will only use risk factors accessible in primary care and endow the model with the ability to update risk prediction as it is presented with new data, to make the model more useful in clinical practice. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Permissions for CPRD-GOLD and CPRD-AURUM datasets were obtained from CPRD (ref no: 19_076). The CPRD ethical approval committee approved the study. The results will be submitted as a research paper for publication to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at peer-reviewed conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS: A systematic review to incorporate within the overall project was registered on PROSPERO (registration number CRD42021245093). The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04657900).

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationStrokeArtificial IntelligenceElectronic Health RecordsHumansPrecision MedicineSystematic Reviews as Topicadult cardiologycardiac epidemiologyhealth informaticspacing & electrophysiologyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID34728455
PMCPMC8565546
OpenAlexW3209819173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.