SynthesisBMJ open2021
Gender differences in faculty rank among academic physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Gender Authorship in Gastroenterology and Hepatology: Trends and Persistent Seniority Gaps.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- A 20-Year Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Gender Workforce in Medical Departments of Psychiatry/Psychotherapy and Neurology in Germany.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Organizational and Systems-Based Framework to Guide a Departmental Approach to Academic and Leadership Advancement for Women in Emergency Medicine.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- Where the pipeline leaks and delays: gendered academic dynamics in anatomy in Türkiye.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- Individual and institutional factors linked to high research productivity among physicians in the Arab Gulf region: implications for healthcare policy.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The inverted gender pyramid in career progression among GCC physicians: implications for health workforce policy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Gender representation in leadership and speaking roles at rehabilitation medicine conferences in the UK: a 26-year analysis.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Gender Differences in National Institutes of Health Funding for Family Medicine Faculty.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026Article
- Serendipity, support and equity: a qualitative study examining career initiation in medical education.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- The Social Network of Otolaryngology: Collaborative Publishing Relationships by Gender.The Laryngoscope · 2025Article
- Professional Title Use and Gender Representation During Grand Rounds and Invited Lectureships Across Specialties.The Permanente journal · 2025Observational
- Factors associated with women authorship over 25 years in high-impact critical care randomized controlled trials: the pipeline is still leaking.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Interventions designed to increase scholarly activity and achieve promotion among primarily junior clinical faculty in the United States: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Observational
- Gender-based differences in associated factors of perceived salary satisfaction among physicians: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Trends in self-citation rates in high-impact neurology, neuroscience, and psychiatry journals.eLife · 2025Article
- Representation of Women Among Cardiology Grand Rounds Speakers in the United States.JAMA cardiology · 2025Article
- Through ChatGPT's Eyes: The Large Language Model's Stereotypes and what They Reveal About Healthcare.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMany studies have analysed gender bias in academic medicine; however, no comprehensive synthesis of the literature has been performed. We conducted a pooled analysis of the difference in the proportion of men versus women with full professorship among academic physicians.
designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Education Resources Information Center and PsycINFO were searched from inception to 3 July 2020. STUDY SELECTION: All original studies reporting faculty rank stratified by gender worldwide were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Study screening, data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers, with a third author resolving discrepancies. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models.
resultsOur search yielded 5897 articles. 218 studies were included with 991 207 academic physician data points. Men were 2.77 times more likely to be full professors (182 271/643 790 men vs 30 349/251 501 women, OR 2.77, 95% CI 2.57 to 2.98). Although men practised for longer (median 18 vs 12 years, p<0.00002), the gender gap remained after pooling seven studies that adjusted for factors including time in practice, specialty, publications, h-index, additional PhD and institution (adjusted OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.20). Meta-regression by data collection year demonstrated improvement over time (p=0.0011); however, subgroup analysis showed that gender disparities remain significant in the 2010-2020 decade (OR 2.63, 95% CI 2.48 to 2.80). The gender gap was present across all specialties and both within and outside of North America. Men published more papers (mean difference 17.2, 95% CI 14.7 to 19.7), earned higher salaries (mean difference $33 256, 95% CI $25 969 to $40 542) and were more likely to be departmental chairs (OR 2.61, 95% CI 2.19 to 3.12).
conclusionsGender inequity in academic medicine exists across all specialties, geographical regions and multiple measures of success, including academic rank, publications, salary and leadership. Men are more likely than women to be full professors after controlling for experience, academic productivity and specialty. Although there has been some improvement over time, the gender disparity in faculty rank persists. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020197414.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.