Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34728251›Full record

ArticleAppetite2022

External food cue responsiveness and emotional eating in adolescents: A multimethod study.

Camille R Schneider-Worthington, Kathryn E Smith, James N Roemmich, Sarah-Jeanne Salvy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Camille R Schneider-WorthingtonDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. Electronic address: cschneid@uab.edu.
Kathryn E SmithDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Southern California, 2250 Alcazar St, #2200, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
James N RoemmichGrand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 2420 2nd Avenue N, Grand Forks, ND, 58201, USA.
Sarah-Jeanne SalvyResearch Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 700 N. San Vicente Blvd., West Hollywood, CA, 90069, USA.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USGrand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Time-Restricted Eating and Cancer: Clinical Outcomes, Mechanisms, and ModeratorsR01CA258222 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI FIGUEIREDO, JANE C., PETERSON, COURTNEY MARIE · 2021 to 2025
$4.1M
Evaluating environmental control (AVOID) and inhibitory control (RESIST) strategies to improve weight management outcomesR01DK130851 · NIDDK · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI Sarah-Jeanne Salvy · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
In-home obesity prevention to reach low-income infants through maternal and social transmissionR01HD092483 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DE LA HAYE, KAYLA, SALVY, SARAH-JEANNE · 2017 to 2021
$2.7M
Non-shared environments and discordance of obesity in adolescent siblingsR01HD064958 · NICHD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2010 to 2013
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA258222NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD064958NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD092483NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK130851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eating in response to external food cues (i.e., external eating) and internal emotional experiences (i.e., emotional eating) are associated with obesity. While external and emotional eating co-occur, little is known about how external food cue responsiveness may interact with internal emotional cues to influence eating episodes in adolescents. The current study examined how trait-level external food cue responsiveness modulates momentary associations between affective states and eating in adolescents. Participants were drawn from a prior study of siblings (N = 78; ages 13-17) who completed an ecological momentary assessment protocol to assess eating episodes and affective states. External food cue responsiveness was determined by comparing energy consumption following presentation of an appetizing food (pizza) on one day and a control activity (reading) on another day. Generalized linear mixed models examined positive and negative affective states, cue responsiveness, and their interactions as predictors of the likelihood of eating. The relationship between affective states and likelihood of eating was stronger among adolescents with higher versus lower external food cue responsiveness. Among adolescents with higher cue responsiveness, endorsing negative affect was associated with a lower likelihood of eating, whereas endorsing positive affect was associated with a higher likelihood of eating (within-person effects). Findings suggest that high sensitivity to external food cues and greater proclivity for emotional eating may be likely to coincide such that any cue, internal or external, is likely to disrupt sensitivity to internal hunger and satiety signals. Future studies are needed to elucidate how sensitivities to internal and external cues may interact to influence obesity risk.

Indexed as

CuesFoodAdolescentEatingEmotionsFeeding BehaviorHumansHungerObesityAdolescenceEcological momentary assessmentEmotional eatingFood cue

Identifiers

PMID34728251
PMCPMC8671220
OpenAlexW3209513173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.