ReviewCytokine & growth factor reviews2022
COVID-19 and dys-regulation of pulmonary endothelium: implications for vascular remodeling.
Review in Cytokine & growth factor reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulmonary vascular dysfunction in ARDS Pathophysiology and therapeutic implications.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
- The Role of Toll-like Receptors and Viral Infections in the Pathogenesis and Progression of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Activation of the coagulation cascade as a mechanism for selective nanoparticle-mediated RNA delivery to the endothelium in vivo.Science advances · 2025Article
- Article
- The Relevance of the Endothelium in Cardiopulmonary Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Molecular cross-talk between long COVID-19 and Alzheimer's disease.GeroScience · 2024Review
- The vascular perspective on acute and chronic lung disease.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023Review
- Persistent Lung Injury and Prothrombotic State in Long COVID.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), the disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2, has claimed more than 4.4 million lives worldwide (as of 20 August 2021). Severe cases of the disease often result in respiratory distress due to cytokine storm, and mechanical ventilation is required. Although, the lungs are the primary organs affected by the disease, more evidence on damage to the heart, kidney, and liver is emerging. A common link in these connections is the cardiovascular network. Inner lining of the blood vessels, called endothelium, is formed by a single layer of endothelial cells. Several clinical manifestations involving the endothelium have been reported, such as its activation via immunomodulation, endotheliitis, thrombosis, vasoconstriction, and distinct intussusceptive angiogenesis (IA), a unique and rapid process of blood-vessel formation by splitting a vessel into two lumens. In fact, the virus directly infects the endothelium via TMPRSS2 spike glycoprotein priming to facilitate ACE-2-mediated viral entry. Recent studies have indicated a significant increase in remodeling of the pulmonary vascular bed via intussusception in patients with COVID-19. However, the lack of circulatory biomarkers for IA limits its detection in COVID-19 pathogenesis. In this review, we describe the implications of angiogenesis in COVID-19, unique features of the pulmonary vascular bed and its remodeling, and a rapid and non-invasive assessment of IA to overcome the technical limitations in patients with COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.