ArticleBMC public health2021
Exploring the benefits of participation in community-based running and walking events: a cross-sectional survey of parkrun participants.
Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- "We WantQualitative health research · 2025Article
- A generic model of life satisfaction: The case study of parkrun.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Temporal changes in thiol-oxidized plasma albumin are associated with recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage after a marathon.Physiological reports · 2024Article
- The long-term effect of the coronavirus pandemic on parkrun participation: an interrupted time series analysis.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Coming back for more: individual participation patterns in the physical activity initiative parkrun in Australia.Health promotion international · 2024Article
- A mixed-method analysis of the contribution of informal sport to public health in Australia.Health promotion international · 2024Article
- Study protocol - assessing parkrun for walking rehabilitation for people living with, and beyond, cancer: acceptability, adherence, social support and physical function.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Engaging underrepresented groups in community physical activity initiatives: a qualitative study of parkrun in the UK.BMC public health · 2024Article
- The impact of parkrun on life satisfaction and its cost-effectiveness: A six-month study of parkrunners in the United Kingdom.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- How can UK public health initiatives support each other to improve the maintenance of physical activity? Evidence from a cross-sectional survey of runners who move from Couch-to-5k to parkrun.Health promotion international · 2023Article
- Running-Related Overuse Injuries and Their Relationship with Run and Resistance Training Characteristics in Adult Recreational Runners: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2023Article
- Parkrun as self-managed cardiac rehabilitation: secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey of parkrun in the UK.Open heart · 2023Article
- Change in health, wellbeing and physical activity levels during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal cohort of parkrun participants in the United Kingdom.Health promotion international · 2023Article
- Self-based goals, underlying reasons, performance and discrete emotions among parkrunners.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Sports and Social Interaction: Sports Experiences and Attitudes of the Urban Running Community.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Implementation of Congestion-Related Controls Improves Runner Density, Flow Rate, Perceived Safety, and Satisfaction during an Australian Running Event.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- parkrun and the promotion of physical activity: insights for primary care clinicians from an online survey.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022Article
- Improved Endurance Running Performance Following Haskap Berry (Nutrients · 2022Article
- Challenges and Approaches to Green Social Prescribing During and in the Aftermath of COVID-19: A Qualitative Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- "Like Nothing I've Seen Before": A Qualitative Inquiry Into the Lived Experience of Competing in a Trail Running Event.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhilst the benefits of physical activity for health and wellbeing are recognised, population levels of activity remain low. Significant inequalities exist, with socioeconomically disadvantaged populations being less physically active and less likely to participate in community events. We investigated the perceived benefits from participation in a weekly running/walking event called parkrun by those living in the most socioeconomically deprived areas and doing the least physical activity.
methodsA cross-sectional online survey was emailed to 2,318,135 parkrun participants in the UK. Demographic and self-reported data was collected on life satisfaction, happiness, health status, physical activity, motives, and the perceived benefits of parkrun. Motivation, health status and benefits were compared for sub-groups defined by physical activity level at parkrun registration and residential Index of Multiple Deprivation.
results60,000 completed surveys were received (2.7% of those contacted). Respondents were more recently registered with parkrun (3.1 v. 3.5 years) than the parkrun population and had a higher frequency of parkrun participation (14.5 v. 3.7 parkruns per year). Those inactive at registration and from deprived areas reported lower happiness, lower life satisfaction and poorer health compared to the full sample. They were more likely to want to improve their physical health, rather than get fit or for competition. Of those reporting less than one bout of activity per week at registration, 88% (87% in the most deprived areas) increased their physical activity level and 52% (65% in the most deprived areas) reported improvements to overall health behaviours. When compared to the full sample, a greater proportion of previously inactive respondents from the most deprived areas reported improvements to fitness (92% v. 89%), physical health (90% v. 85%), happiness (84% v. 79%) and mental health (76% v. 69%).
conclusionThe least active respondents from the most socioeconomically deprived areas reported increases to their activity levels and benefits to health and wellbeing since participating in parkrun. Whilst the challenge of identifying how community initiatives like parkrun can better engage with underrepresented populations remains, if this can be achieved they could have a critical public health role in addressing inequalities in benefits associated with recreational physical activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.