Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34727703›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2021

Social convergence of gut microbiomes in vampire bats.

Karthik Yarlagadda, Imran Razik, Ripan S Malhi, Gerald G Carter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A host of issues: pseudoreplication in host-microbiota studies.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ecology and evolution of the social microbiome.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Social association predicts immunological similarity in rewilded mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Karthik YarlagaddaDepartment of Anthropology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2581-0782
Imran RazikDepartment of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Ripan S MalhiDepartment of Anthropology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Gerald G CarterDepartment of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute · PAUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 'social microbiome' can fundamentally shape the costs and benefits of group-living, but understanding social transmission of microbes in free-living animals is challenging due to confounding effects of kinship and shared environments (e.g. highly associated individuals often share the same spaces, food and water). Here, we report evidence for convergence towards a social microbiome among introduced common vampire bats,

Indexed as

ChiropteraGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsFecesFoodHumansmicrobiomesocial networkvampire bat

Identifiers

PMID34727703
PMCPMC8563296
OpenAlexW3210513731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.