Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34727472›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of craniofacial surgery

Parental Reports of Intervention Services and Prevalence of Teasing in a Multinational Craniofacial Microsomia Pediatric Study.

Alexis L Johns, Daniela V Luquetti, Carrie L Heike, Amelia F Drake, Milagros M Dueñas Roque, Paula Hurtado-Villa, Harry Pachajoa, Gloria Liliana Porras-Hurtado, Ignacio Zarante, Leanne Magee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of craniofacial surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Participant Perspectives on Data Sharing in Clinical Craniofacial Research: Qualitative Interviews With Participants With Craniofacial Microsomia and Their Caregivers.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Establishing an International Interdisciplinary Research Network in Craniofacial Microsomia: The CARE Program.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2024
    Article
  3. Psychosocial and Health-Related Experiences of Individuals With Microtia and Craniofacial Microsomia and Their Families: Narrative Review Over 2 Decades.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alexis L JohnsChildren's Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Daniela V LuquettiCraniofacial Center at Seattle Children's Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Carrie L HeikeCraniofacial Center at Seattle Children's Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Amelia F DrakeUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Milagros M Dueñas RoqueHospital Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, EsSalud, Jesús María, Peru.
Paula Hurtado-VillaPontificia Universidad Javeriana.
Harry PachajoaUniversidad Icesi, Cali.
Gloria Liliana Porras-HurtadoComfamiliar Risaralda, Pereira.
Ignacio ZarantePontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Leanne MageeChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
Craniofacial Microsomia: Genetic Causes and Pathway DiscoveryU01DE025862 · NIDCR · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI HEIKE, CARRIE LYN · 2017 to 2021
$3.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE025862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractChildren with craniofacial microsomia (CFM) are at increased risk for educational and social concerns. This study describes intervention services and frequency of teasing in a multinational population of children with CFM. Caregivers of children with CFM ages 3 to 18 years in the US and South America were administered a questionnaire. Additional information was gathered from medical charts and photographs. Participants (N = 169) had an average age of 10.1 ± 6.2 years, were primarily male (60%), and from the US (46%) or Colombia (32%). Most participants had microtia and mandibular hypoplasia (70%). They often had unilateral (71%) or bilateral (19%) hearing loss and 53% used a hearing aid. In the US, special education services were provided for 48% of participants enrolled in school; however, similar services were rare (4%) in South America and reflect differences in education systems. Access to any intervention service was higher in the US (80%) than in South America (48%). Caregivers reported children showed diagnosis awareness by an average age of 4.4 ± 1.9 years. Current or past teasing was reported in 41% of the children, starting at a mean age of 6.0 ± 2.4 years, and most often took place at school (86%). As half of the US participants received developmental and academic interventions, providers should screen for needs and facilitate access to services. Given diagnosis awareness at age 4 and teasing at age 6, providers are encouraged to assess for psychosocial concerns and link to resources early in treatment.

Indexed as

Congenital MicrotiaGoldenhar SyndromeAdolescentCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolHumansMaleParentsPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID34727472
PMCPMC9248443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.