ReviewAnnals of nuclear medicine2022
Progress and future prospective of FDG-PET/CT imaging combined with optimized procedures in lung cancer: toward precision medicine.
Review in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review of harmonization strategies for quantitative PET.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2023Review
- Thorax radiotherapy usingFrontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With a 5-year overall survival of approximately 20%, lung cancer has always been the number one cancer-specific killer all over the world. As a fusion of positron emission computed tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT), PET/CT has revolutionized cancer imaging over the past 20 years. In this review, we focused on the optimization of the function of
Indexed as
Identifiers
34727331What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.