ReviewRadiological physics and technology2021
History of medical physics.
Review in Radiological physics and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of immersive educational technologies in medical physics and radiation physics.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- New estimation of S-coefficients for radionuclides C-11, N-13, O-15, and F-18 in male and female computational mesh-type phantom using DoseCalcs code.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- The State of High-Resolution Imaging of the Human Inner Ear: A Look Into the Black Box.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Creation, evolution, and future challenges of ion beam therapy from a medical physicist's viewpoint (Part 3): Chapter 3. Clinical research, Chapter 4. Future challenges, Chapter 5. Discussion, and Conclusion.Radiological physics and technology · 2023Review
- Validation of the DoseCalcs Monte Carlo code for estimating theRadiological physics and technology · 2023Article
- Photon-specific absorbed fraction estimates in stylized ORNL and voxelized ICRP adult male phantoms using a new developed Geant4-based code "DoseCalcs": a validation study.Radiological physics and technology · 2022Article
- Creation, evolution, and future challenges of ion beam therapy from a medical physicist's viewpoint (part 1). Introduction and Chapter 1. accelerator and beam delivery system.Radiological physics and technology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical physics began with the development of safe handling of radium, such as protecting medical personnel from radiation when radium radiation is used to treat cancer. By the end of World War II, the field of medical physics had expanded to the development of safe and reliable treatments for cancer with radiation and quantification of radiation dose, which is called dosimetry that is required to evaluate the therapeutic effect. The rapid development of nuclear technology during World War II made it possible to use large amounts of radioisotopes (RI) produced in nuclear reactors, and the medical use of RI gave birth to clinical nuclear medicine. Since knowledge and skills in radiation measurement and RI handling were required for the development and clinical use of its equipment, nuclear medicine physics was added to medical physics after the war. The invention of computed tomography (CT) in 1972 had a great impact on clinical medicine, while the development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) began around that time. As a result, the development of CT and MRI, as well as the study of their image characteristics, which had not necessarily been regarded as the field of medical physics before, was added to that field as radiation diagnostic physics. This review outlines the history of developments in medical physics, and touches on the first medical physicists in Europe and the United States. It also briefly explains the beginning of medical physics and the world-class medical physics achievements in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.