Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34727303›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2021

DICOM Image ANalysis and Archive (DIANA): an Open-Source System for Clinical AI Applications.

Thomas Yi, Ian Pan, Scott Collins, Fiona Chen, Robert Cueto, Ben Hsieh, Celina Hsieh, Jessica L Smith, Li Yang, Wei-Hua Liao and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. aXonica: A support package for MRI based Neuroimaging.Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas YiDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Ian PanDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Scott CollinsDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Fiona ChenDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Robert CuetoUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Ben HsiehDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Celina HsiehDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Jessica L SmithDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Li YangDepartment of Neurology, Second Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, China.
Wei-Hua LiaoDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, China.
Lisa H MerckWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Harrison BaiDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA. Harrison_bai@brown.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9614-2163
Derek MerckDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Providence College · USBrown University · USCentral South University · CNUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of data-driven medicine, rapid access and accurate interpretation of medical images are becoming increasingly important. The DICOM Image ANalysis and Archive (DIANA) system is an open-source, lightweight, and scalable Python interface that enables users to interact with hospital Picture Archiving and Communications Systems (PACS) to access such data. In this work, DIANA functionality was detailed and evaluated in the context of retrospective PACS data retrieval and two prospective clinical artificial intelligence (AI) pipelines: bone age (BA) estimation and intra-cranial hemorrhage (ICH) detection. DIANA orchestrates activity beginning with post-acquisition study discovery and ending with online notifications of findings. For AI applications, system latency (exam completion to system report time) was quantified and compared to that of clinicians (exam completion to initial report creation time). Mean DIANA latency was 9.04 ± 3.83 and 20.17 ± 10.16 min compared to clinician latency of 51.52 ± 58.9 and 65.62 ± 110.39 min for BA and ICH, respectively, with DIANA latencies being significantly lower (p < 0.001). DIANA's capabilities were also explored and found effective in retrieving and anonymizing protected health information for "big-data" medical imaging research and analysis. Mean per-image retrieval times were 1.12 ± 0.50 and 0.08 ± 0.01 s across x-ray and computed tomography studies, respectively. The data herein demonstrate that DIANA can flexibly integrate into existing hospital infrastructure and improve the process by which researchers/clinicians access imaging repository data. This results in a simplified workflow for large data retrieval and clinical integration of AI models.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiology Information SystemsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceBone ageDICOMIntracranial hemorrhageMachine learningPACS

Identifiers

PMID34727303
PMCPMC8669082
OpenAlexW3210570170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.