Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34727227›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2022

The effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task.

Kristy Themelis, Natasha Ratcliffe, Tomohiko Nishigami, Benedict M Wand, Roger Newport, Tasha R Stanton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristy ThemelisSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. Kristy.themelis@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0022-5272
Natasha RatcliffeSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Tomohiko NishigamiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health and Welfare, Prefectural University of Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6969-8916
Benedict M WandSchool of Physiotherapy, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0297-0292
Roger NewportSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0669-1266
Tasha R StantonIIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7106-4456

Funding

BIAL Foundation 203/12National Health and Medical Research Council 1141735Wellcome Trust 110216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body re-sizing illusions can profoundly alter perception of our own body. We investigated whether creating the illusion of a muscled and fit-looking back (Strong) influenced perceived back size, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers performed a standardised lifting task while viewing real-time (delay < 20 ms) video of their own back through a head-mounted display under four different conditions (Normal size, Strong, Reshaped, Large; order randomised). The MIRAGE-mediated reality system was used to modify the shape, size, and morphology of the back. Participants were poor at recognizing the correct appearance of their back, for both implicit (perceived width of shoulders and hips) and explicit (questionnaire) measures of back size. Visual distortions of body shape (Reshaped condition) altered implicit back size measures. However, viewing a muscled back (Strong condition) did not result in a sense of agency or ownership and did not update implicit perception of the back. No conditions improved perceptions/attitudes of self-capacity (perceived back strength, perceived lifting confidence, and perceived back fitness). The results lend support for the importance of the embodiment of bodily changes to induce changes in perception. Further work is warranted to determine whether increased exposure to illusory changes would alter perceptions and attitudes towards self-capacity or whether different mechanisms are involved.

Indexed as

IllusionsTouch PerceptionBody ImageBody SizeHumansLiftingMaleOwnershipSurveys and QuestionnairesVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID34727227
PMCPMC9363286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.