Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34727175›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2022

An ecological perspective on water shedding from leaves.

Anne-Kristin Lenz, Ulrike Bauer, Graeme D Ruxton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne-Kristin LenzSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9899-8088
Ulrike BauerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4701-793X
Graeme D RuxtonSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, Dryers Brae, Greenside Place, St Andrews, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8943-6609

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water shedding from leaves is a complex process depending on multiple leaf traits interacting with rain, wind, and air humidity, and with the entire plant and surrounding vegetation. Here, we synthesize current knowledge of the physics of water shedding with implications for plant physiology and ecology. We argue that the drop retention angle is a more meaningful parameter to characterize the water-shedding capacity of leaves than the commonly measured static contact angle. The understanding of the mechanics of water shedding is largely derived from laboratory experiments on artificial rather than natural surfaces, often on individual aspects such as surface wettability or drop impacts. In contrast, field studies attempting to identify the adaptive value of leaf traits linked to water shedding are largely correlative in nature, with inconclusive results. We make a strong case for taking the hypothesis-driven experimental approach of biomechanical laboratory studies into a real-world field setting to gain a comprehensive understanding of leaf water shedding in a whole-plant ecological and evolutionary context.

Indexed as

Plant LeavesWaterRainWettabilityWaterDrip tipsdrop impactepicuticular waxleaf inclination angleleaf movementleaf trait adaptationsplash erosiontrichomeswater repellencywater shedding

Identifiers

PMID34727175
PMCPMC8866647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.