Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34727165›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2021

Can the causal role of brain oscillations be studied through rhythmic brain stimulation?

Tanya Lobo, Matthew J Brookes, Markus Bauer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A therapeutic small molecule enhances γ-oscillations and improves cognition/memory in Alzheimer's disease model mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. No Evidence for Entrainment: Endogenous Gamma Oscillations and Rhythmic Flicker Responses Coexist in Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tanya LoboSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK.
Matthew J BrookesSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK.
Markus BauerSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBBauer Research Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies have investigated the causal relevance of brain oscillations using rhythmic stimulation, either through direct-brain or sensory stimulation. Yet, how intrinsic rhythms interact with the externally generated rhythm is largely unknown. We presented a flickered (60 Hz) visual grating or its correspondent unflickered stimulus in a psychophysical change detection task during simultaneous magnetoencephalography recordings to humans to test the effect of visual entrainment on induced gamma oscillations. Notably, we generally observed the coexistence of the broadband induced gamma rhythm with the entrained flicker rhythm (reliably measured in each participant), with the peak frequency of the induced response remaining unaltered in approximately half of participants-relatively independently of their native frequency. However, flicker increased broadband induced gamma power, and this was stronger in participants with a native frequency closer to the flicker frequency (resonance) and led to strong phase entrainment. Presence of flicker did not change behavior itself but profoundly altered brain behavior correlates across the sample: While broadband induced gamma oscillations correlated with reaction times for unflickered stimuli (as known previously), for the flicker, the amplitude of the entrained flicker rhythm (but no more the induced oscillation) correlated with reaction times. This, however, strongly depended on whether a participant's peak frequency shifted to the entrained rhythm. Our results suggests that rhythmic brain stimulation leads to a coexistence of two partially independent oscillations with heterogeneous effects across participants on the downstream relevance of these rhythms for behavior. This may explain the inconsistency of findings related to external entrainment of brain oscillations and poses further questions toward causal manipulations of brain oscillations in general.

Indexed as

BrainVisual PerceptionHumansMagnetoencephalographyPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34727165
PMCPMC8572434
OpenAlexW3209487233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.