Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34726748›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2021

Patient-Reported Testing Burden of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Among Women With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: An Ancillary Study of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112).

Soudabeh Fazeli, Bradley S Snyder, Ilana F Gareen, Constance D Lehman, Seema A Khan, Justin Romanoff, Constantine A Gatsonis, Kathy D Miller, Joseph A Sparano, Christopher E Comstock and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quality of life issues in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Errors in Table 3 Footnotes.JAMA network open · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Soudabeh FazeliDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego.
Bradley S SnyderCenter for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Ilana F GareenCenter for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Constance D LehmanDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Seema A KhanDepartment of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Justin RomanoffCenter for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Constantine A GatsonisCenter for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Kathy D MillerDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis.
Joseph A SparanoAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
Christopher E ComstockDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Lynne I WagnerWake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Ruth C CarlosDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Brown University · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USHarvard University · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
ECOG-ACRIN NCORP Research Base - TMISTUG1CA189828 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer, MITCHELL D. SCHNALL · 2014 to 2026
$199.7M
UM LAPs -UG1 GrantUG1CA233160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ANNE F SCHOTT · 2019 to 2026
$5.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189828NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pretreatment planning of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. Understanding changes in short-term health-related quality of life associated with breast MRI would allow for a more complete comparative effectiveness assessment. Objective: To assess whether there are changes in patient-reported quality of life associated with breast MRI among women diagnosed with DCIS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was a substudy of a nonrandomized clinical trial conducted at 75 participating US institutions from March 2015 to April 2016. Women recently diagnosed with unilateral DCIS who were eligible for wide local excision and had a diagnostic mammogram within 3 months of study registration were included. A total of 355 women met the eligibility criteria and underwent the study MRI. Data analysis was performed from June 3, 2020, to July 1, 2021. Exposures: Participants underwent bilateral breast MRI within 30 days of study registration and before surgery. Information on patient-reported testing burden for breast MRI was collected after MRI and before surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of this substudy was the patient-reported testing burden of breast MRI, measured by the Testing Morbidities Index (TMI) summated scale score. The TMI is a 7-item instrument that evaluates the temporary changes in quality of life associated with imaging before, during, and after the test (0 represents the worst possible, 100 the hypothetical ideal test experience). Results: Of the 355 women who met the eligibility criteria, 244 (69%) completed both questionnaires and were included in this analysis. The median age was 59 years (range, 34-85 years). The mean MRI TMI summated scale score was 85.9 (95% CI, 84.6-87.3). Of the 244 women, 142 (58%) experienced at least some fear and anxiety before the examination, and 120 women (49%) experienced fear and anxiety during the examination. A total of 156 women (64%) experienced pain or discomfort during the examination. In multivariable analyses, greater test-related burden was associated with higher levels of cancer worry (regression coefficient, -2.75; SE, 0.94; P = .004). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, a clinically meaningful breast MRI testing burden among women with DCIS was revealed that was significantly associated with cancer worry. Understanding the potential quality-of-life reduction associated with MRI, especially when used in combination with mammography, may allow development of targeted interventions to improve the patient experience.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingClinical Trials as TopicFearFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID34726748
PMCPMC8564581
OpenAlexW3210533042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.