Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34726743›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Ad26.COV2.S Adenoviral Vector Vaccine for Preventing COVID-19.

Juan Corchado-Garcia, David Zemmour, Travis Hughes, Hari Bandi, Tudor Cristea-Platon, Patrick Lenehan, Colin Pawlowski, Sairam Bade, John C O'Horo, Gregory J Gores and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Efficacy and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection: interim results of a living systematic review, 1 January to 14 May 2021.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Control of antigen presentation on MHC-I by a bacterial secretion system.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Effectiveness of a nationwide COVID-19 vaccination program in Mexico against symptomatic COVID-19, hospitalizations, and death: a retrospective analysis of national surveillance data.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Comparison of antibody response durability of mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, and Ad26.COV2.S SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in healthcare workers.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Juan Corchado-Garcianference, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
David Zemmournference, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Travis Hughesnference, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Hari Bandinference, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Tudor Cristea-Platonnference, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Patrick Lenehannference, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Colin Pawlowskinference, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Sairam Badenference Labs, Murgesh Pallya, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
John C O'HoroDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Gregory J GoresDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Amy W WilliamsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Andrew D BadleyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
John HalamkaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Abinash VirkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Melanie D SwiftDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Tyler Wagnernference, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Venky Soundararajannference, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Nference (United States) · USMayo Clinic · USNference (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Continuous assessment of the effectiveness and safety of the US Food and Drug Administration-authorized SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is critical to amplify transparency, build public trust, and ultimately improve overall health outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Johnson & Johnson Ad26.COV2.S vaccine for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. Design, Setting, and Participants: This comparative effectiveness research study used large-scale longitudinal curation of electronic health records from the multistate Mayo Clinic Health System (Minnesota, Arizona, Florida, Wisconsin, and Iowa) to identify vaccinated and unvaccinated adults between February 27 and July 22, 2021. The unvaccinated cohort was matched on a propensity score derived from age, sex, zip code, race, ethnicity, and previous number of SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction tests. The final study cohort consisted of 8889 patients in the vaccinated group and 88 898 unvaccinated matched patients. Exposure: Single dose of the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine. Main Outcomes and Measures: The incidence rate ratio of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the vaccinated vs unvaccinated control cohorts, measured by SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction testing. Results: The study was composed of 8889 vaccinated patients (4491 men [50.5%]; mean [SD] age, 52.4 [16.9] years) and 88 898 unvaccinated patients (44 748 men [50.3%]; mean [SD] age, 51.7 [16.7] years). The incidence rate ratio of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the vaccinated vs unvaccinated control cohorts was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.20-0.34) (60 of 8889 vaccinated patients vs 2236 of 88 898 unvaccinated individuals), which corresponds to an effectiveness of 73.6% (95% CI, 65.9%-79.9%) and a 3.73-fold reduction in SARS-CoV-2 infections. Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings are consistent with the clinical trial-reported efficacy of Ad26.COV2.S and the first retrospective analysis, suggesting that the vaccine is effective at reducing SARS-CoV-2 infection, even with the spread of variants such as Alpha or Delta that were not present in the original studies, and reaffirm the urgent need to continue mass vaccination efforts globally.

Indexed as

Ad26COVS1AdolescentAdultAgedCOVID-19COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingCOVID-19 VaccinesDrug EvaluationFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesAd26COVS1COVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34726743
PMCPMC8564583
OpenAlexW3210363990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.