ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2021
A Comparison of Risks and Benefits Regarding Hip Arthroplasty Fixation.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early Performance of a Collared, Triple-Tapered Cementless Femoral Stem in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Exploratory in vitro study of inductive heating-assisted refixation in cemented hip stems.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cemented total hip arthroplasty reduces early complications: a Japanese nationwide propensity-matched study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- 10-year survival comparison of two cemented implants in primary total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a New Zealand regional study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Anterior lumbar interbody fusion implants: a narrative review of current trends and future directions.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2025Review
- Biomechanical Impact of Cementation Technique Variations on Femoral Stem Stability: An In Vitro Polyurethane Model Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Survey of Orthopedic Surgeons' Perceptions of Adopting an Initiative With Cemented Hip Hemiarthroplasties for Fractures.The Permanente journal · 2025Article
- CORR Insights®: Can Bisphosphonate Therapy Reduce Overall Mortality in Patients With Osteoporosis? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- Effect of using nano-particles of magnesium oxide and titanium dioxide to enhance physical and mechanical properties of hip joint bone cement.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the field-changing invention of noncemented hip arthroplasty fixation in the 1980s, noncemented fixation has been progressively replacing cemented fixation. However, analyses of fixation frequencies reveal new patterns in cement versus noncemented preferences. Although cementation is again gaining ground in the United States, noncemented models remain the dominant fixation mode, seen in more than 90% of all hip arthroplasties. This stark preference is likely driven by concerns regarding implant durability and patient safety. Although advances in surgical techniques, intensive perioperative care, and improved instrument have evolved in both methods, data from large arthroplasty registries reveal shifting risks in contemporary hip arthroplasty, calling the use of noncemented fixation into question. Varying risk profiles regarding sex, age, or health comorbidities and morphological and functional differences necessitate personalized risk assessments. Furthermore, certain patient populations, based on the literature and data from large registries, have superior outcomes from cemented hip arthroplasty techniques. Therefore, we wanted to critically evaluate the method of arthroplasty fixation in primary hip arthroplasties for unique patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.