ReviewJMIR formative research2021
Usability-In-Place-Remote Usability Testing Methods for Homebound Older Adults: Rapid Literature Review.
Review in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blockchain-Based Mobile App for Digital Identification of Older Adults in Rural Peru: Design and Usability Evaluation Study.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026Article
- Knowledge user involvement is still uncommon in published rapid reviews-a meta-research cross-sectional study.Research synthesis methods · 2025Article
- Flagged for Fraud: Lessons From 3 Case Studies on Detecting Inauthentic Participants in Online Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Usability of Videoconferencing for Physical Exercise Interventions in Older Adults: Scoping Review.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2025Review
- Development and Systematic Evaluation of a Progressive Web Application for Women With Cardiac Pain: Usability Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Investigating the Best Practices for Engagement in Remote Participatory Design: Mixed Methods Analysis of 4 Remote Studies With Family Caregivers.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Remote Inclusion of Vulnerable Users in mHealth Intervention Design: Retrospective Case Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Article
- Usability of the "Systematic Review Support" computer system: a methodological study.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2024Article
- Navigating Challenges and Opportunities in Community-Based Interventions for Promoting Active Aging: A Systematic Review of the Roles of Technology.Innovation in aging · 2024Review
- Evaluating the usability of a co-designed power assisted exercise graphical user interface for people with stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Design and Evaluation of Personalized Services to Foster Active Aging: The Experience of Technology Pre-Validation in Italian Pilots.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Remote Moderator and Observer Experiences and Decision-making During Usability Testing of a Web-Based Empathy Training Portal: Content Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTechnology can benefit older adults in many ways, including by facilitating remote access to services, communication, and socialization for convenience or out of necessity when individuals are homebound. As people, especially older adults, self-quarantined and sheltered in place during the COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of usability-in-place became clear. To understand the remote use of technology in an ecologically valid manner, researchers and others must be able to test usability remotely.
objectiveOur objective was to review practical approaches for and findings about remote usability testing, particularly remote usability testing with older adults.
methodsWe performed a rapid review of the literature and reported on available methods, their advantages and disadvantages, and practical recommendations. This review also reported recommendations for usability testing with older adults from the literature.
resultsCritically, we identified a gap in the literature-a lack of remote usability testing methods, tools, and strategies for older adults, despite this population's increased remote technology use and needs (eg, due to disability or technology experience). We summarized existing remote usability methods that were found in the literature as well as guidelines that are available for conducting in-person usability testing with older adults.
conclusionsWe call on the human factors research and practice community to address this gap to better support older adults and other homebound or mobility-restricted individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.