Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34726604›Full record

ReviewJMIR formative research2021

Usability-In-Place-Remote Usability Testing Methods for Homebound Older Adults: Rapid Literature Review.

Jordan R Hill, Janetta C Brown, Noll L Campbell, Richard J Holden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jordan R HillDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6677-9465
Janetta C BrownIndiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5244-6133
Noll L CampbellDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8933-9339
Richard J HoldenIndiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3603-6158

Funding

Brain Safe: Consumer Intervention to Reduce Exposure to Drugs Linked to Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG056926 · NIA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI HOLDEN, RICHARD J · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTechnology can benefit older adults in many ways, including by facilitating remote access to services, communication, and socialization for convenience or out of necessity when individuals are homebound. As people, especially older adults, self-quarantined and sheltered in place during the COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of usability-in-place became clear. To understand the remote use of technology in an ecologically valid manner, researchers and others must be able to test usability remotely.

objectiveOur objective was to review practical approaches for and findings about remote usability testing, particularly remote usability testing with older adults.

methodsWe performed a rapid review of the literature and reported on available methods, their advantages and disadvantages, and practical recommendations. This review also reported recommendations for usability testing with older adults from the literature.

resultsCritically, we identified a gap in the literature-a lack of remote usability testing methods, tools, and strategies for older adults, despite this population's increased remote technology use and needs (eg, due to disability or technology experience). We summarized existing remote usability methods that were found in the literature as well as guidelines that are available for conducting in-person usability testing with older adults.

conclusionsWe call on the human factors research and practice community to address this gap to better support older adults and other homebound or mobility-restricted individuals.

Indexed as

agingelderlyliterature synthesismethodsmobile usabilitymobile usability testingmobility restrictionolder adultsremote usabilityusability inspectionusability study

Identifiers

PMID34726604
PMCPMC8596282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.