Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34726570›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical biology2021

Chun Li, Xin-You Pan, Mingyun Ma, Jun Zhao, Fengda Zhao, Ya-Ping Lv

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Advancement ofChinese herbal medicines · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Molecular medicine reports · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Recent Advances in the Mechanisms and Applications ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Research Progress on the Anticancer Activity of Plant Polysaccharides.Recent patents on anti-cancer drug discovery · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chun LiDepartment of Doppler Ultrasonic Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Xin-You PanCombined Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine and West Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Mingyun MaCombined Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine and West Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Jun ZhaoDepartment of Rheumatism Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Fengda ZhaoCombined Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine and West Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Ya-Ping LvCombined Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine and West Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Nanchang University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

context

objectiveThis study investigated the mechanism of action of APS in HCC. MATERIALS AND

methodsTumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) were treated with APS (0, 8, 16 mg/mL) for 24 h. APS (16 mg/mL)-treated TAMs were co-cultured with MHCC97H/Huh7 cells for 24 h. Finally, BALB/c nude mice were divided into PBS, APS (50 mg/kg), APS (100 mg/kg), APS (200 mg/kg) groups: mice were inoculated with Huh7 cells to construct tumour xenograft model, followed by administration of APS (50, 100, 200 mg/kg) or PBS daily for 30 days. Cell proliferation, migration, invasion, tumour growth, macrophage markers and proportions were measured.

resultsAPS 16 mg/mL treatment enhanced the expression of M1 macrophage markers (iNOS, IL-1β and TNF-α) and M1 macrophage proportions, while reducing the expression of M2 macrophage markers (IL-10, Arg-1) and M2 macrophage proportions in TAMs. Moreover, the APS-mediated M1 phenotype of TAMs significantly repressed cell proliferation, migration and invasion of MHCC97H and Huh7 cells. Moreover, APS (50, 100, 200 mg/kg) enhanced M1 macrophage proportions and reduced M2 macrophage proportions in the tumour tissues, and thus inhibited tumour growth of HCC. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsAPS inhibits HCC-like phenotypes in a murine HCC model through repression of M2 polarization of TAMs. This work provides a novel theoretical basis for the application of APS in the clinical treatment of HCC.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAstragalus propinquusCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansLiver NeoplasmsMacrophagesMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, NudePhenotypePlant ExtractsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicPlant ExtractsInvasionmigrationproliferationtumour growth

Identifiers

PMID34726570
PMCPMC8567900
OpenAlexW3208998309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.