Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34726066›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2021

Distinct Effects of Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib on Mouse Atrial and Sinoatrial Node Electrophysiology and Arrhythmogenesis.

Jari M Tuomi, Loryn J Bohne, Tristan W Dorey, Hailey J Jansen, Yingjie Liu, Douglas L Jones, Robert A Rose

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jari M TuomiDepartment of Medicine Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry Western University London Ontario Canada.
Loryn J BohneDepartment of Cardiac Sciences Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Cumming School of Medicine Libin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.
Tristan W DoreyDepartment of Cardiac Sciences Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Cumming School of Medicine Libin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.
Hailey J JansenDepartment of Cardiac Sciences Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Cumming School of Medicine Libin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0924-1826
Yingjie LiuDepartment of Cardiac Sciences Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Cumming School of Medicine Libin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.
Douglas L JonesDepartment of Medicine Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry Western University London Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5577-0091
Robert A RoseDepartment of Cardiac Sciences Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Cumming School of Medicine Libin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9880-3482
University of Calgary · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

CIHR MOP 142486CIHR PJT 1666105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Ibrutinib and acalabrutinib are Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in the treatment of B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Ibrutinib is associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation. Cases of sinus bradycardia and sinus arrest have also been reported following ibrutinib treatment. Conversely, acalabrutinib is less arrhythmogenic. The basis for these different effects is unclear. Methods and Results The effects of ibrutinib and acalabrutinib on atrial electrophysiology were investigated in anesthetized mice using intracardiac electrophysiology, in isolated atrial preparations using high-resolution optical mapping, and in isolated atrial and sinoatrial node (SAN) myocytes using patch-clamping. Acute delivery of acalabrutinib did not affect atrial fibrillation susceptibility or other measures of atrial electrophysiology in mice in vivo. Optical mapping demonstrates that ibrutinib dose-dependently impaired atrial and SAN conduction and slowed beating rate. Acalabrutinib had no effect on atrial and SAN conduction or beating rate. In isolated atrial myocytes, ibrutinib reduced action potential upstroke velocity and Na

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacSinoatrial NodeAction PotentialsAdenineAnimalsAtrial FibrillationBenzamidesCardiac ElectrophysiologyMiceMyocytes, CardiacPiperidinesPyrazinesacalabrutinibAdenineBenzamidesibrutinibPiperidinesPyrazinesacalabrutinibatrial fibrillationibrutinibion channelssinoatrial node

Identifiers

PMID34726066
PMCPMC8751944
OpenAlexW3210086718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.