SynthesisJournal of Korean medical science2021
Safety and Effectiveness of F-18 Fluoroestradiol Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of Korean medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of [Cancers · 2025Review
- Article
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Role ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Molecular Imaging of Steroid Receptors in Breast Cancer.Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe conducted a pooled analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of F-18 fluoroestradiol (F-18 FES) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) assessing estrogen receptor expression of patients who have recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.
methodsTwo investigators and seven related experts (from the departments of nuclear medicine, hematological oncology, surgery, and evidence-based medicine) evaluated the effectiveness of F-18 FES PET/CT according to diagnostic accuracy and correlation with immunohistochemistry tests via systematic literature review, and safety according to test-related side effects. The present study was conducted in accordance with the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines (SIGN), and the Cochrane, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses guidelines. The SIGN tools were used for quality assessment.
resultsOf the 512 articles retrieved in the literature search, 8 were deemed to be eligible for inclusion. Results of the evaluation indicated that the F-18 FES PET/CT test was safe because patients who reported pain in the injection site in the analyzed articles are most likely to be caused by mechanical injury from needle injection not by administration of radioactive materials. Assessment of diagnostic accuracy based on data from seven studies revealed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.86 and 0.85, respectively.
conclusionAs such, the test was evaluated to be a safe and effective and, considering the anatomical site where only invasive tests are possible, the test was deemed to have high clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.